Combating antiscience: Are we preparing for the 2020s?

Area of Science:

• Science communication and public engagement
• Sociology of science
• Science policy

Background:

• The late 2010s witnessed a significant rise in antiscience sentiments and direct attacks on scientific professionals globally.
• These trends show no signs of abating, necessitating a proactive response from the scientific community itself.

Purpose of the Study:

• To propose a strategic framework for scientists to effectively engage with a skeptical public.
• To advocate for structural changes in scientific training and career incentives to support public engagement.

Main Methods:

• The study outlines a conceptual approach, drawing on observations of current trends in science-public interactions.
• It emphasizes the need for systemic changes in doctoral and postdoctoral training programs.
• The role of incentivizing senior scientists for public engagement activities is highlighted.

Main Results:

• A growing commitment among young scientists to public service presents a critical opportunity.
• Integrating public engagement into the scientific ecosystem can help counteract antiscience narratives.
• Open-access publishers are identified as potential key partners in this endeavor.

Conclusions:

• The scientific community must take ownership of public engagement to defend its integrity.
• Adapting training and career structures is essential to cultivate a new generation of science communicators.
• Strategic collaborations, including with open-access publishers, can amplify science's societal impact.