Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
Thoughts on Writing for Review: A Former JASMS Associate Editor's Perspective
1Department of Chemistry University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1600, United States.
Abstract:
This is an invited Account and Perspective, providing observations and advice on writing for review derived from a 40-year academic career that has included 27 years' service as an Associate Editor for the Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (JASMS) and nearly 14 years at the National Science Foundation. This work describes an Associate Editor's perspective. It offers observations on what editors and reviewers look for in manuscripts and some of the more common, best avoided mistakes. Emphasis is on JASMS guidelines, but many elements should be generally applicable and are intended for use by both authors and reviewers.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Feedback Inhibition
Proofreading
Proofreading
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...

