Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reasons for non-attendance for computer-managed cervical screening: pilot interviews.

A K Elkind1, D Haran, A Eardley

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Social Oncology, Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Withington, Manchester, England.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of anal fissure.

Techniques in coloproctology·2017
Same author

ENB onus and responsibility.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2016
Same author

Opportunistic testing for urogenital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in south-western Switzerland, 2012: a feasibility study.

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin·2015
Same author

HIV eradication symposium: will the brain be left behind?

Journal of neurovirology·2015
Same author

Towards a quantitative, measurement-based estimate of the uncertainty in photon mass attenuation coefficients at radiation therapy energies.

Physics in medicine and biology·2015
Same author

Physical exam and ultrasound characteristics of right varicocoeles in adolescents with left varicocoeles.

Andrology·2013
Same journal

Toward a typology of government-sanctioned child maltreatment: A scoping review of the harms of U.S. immigration enforcement.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of women in the slums of Guwahati city (Assam, India): A qualitative analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Is intersectionality selective? The role of collider bias.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Violence prevention through legislative change: Qualitative insights on ending the physical punishment of children in the UK.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Does education shield against vaccine hesitancy? Evidence from the East-West divide.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Health inequality aversion in China: Public and decision-maker views.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

Many women miss cervical screening appointments due to issues with the computer database, service organization, and personal barriers like fear and embarrassment. Addressing these factors is key to improving screening attendance rates.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening programs aim to reduce mortality through early detection.
  • Computer-managed systems facilitate population-based screening invitations.
  • Understanding non-attendance is crucial for optimizing screening program effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and categorize the reasons for women's non-attendance at cervical screening appointments.
  • To explore barriers encountered by women invited through a computer-managed system.

Main Methods:

  • Pilot interview study with women who did not attend cervical screening.
  • Qualitative data collection to explore reasons for non-attendance.
  • Analysis of factors related to database accuracy, service provision, and individual characteristics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Inaccurate computer databases led to invitations for ineligible or inaccessible women.
  • Service organization issues included misclassification, communication failures, and unsatisfactory appointments.
  • Personal factors such as perceived inappropriateness, fear, fatalism, and embarrassment influenced attendance.

Conclusions:

  • Non-attendance is multifactorial, stemming from systemic, organizational, and individual barriers.
  • Improvements in database management and service delivery are needed.
  • Addressing women's concerns, fears, and preferences can enhance screening participation.