Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Determination of radiation dose and low-dose protocol for digital chest tomosynthesis using radiophotoluminescent
Sarawut Tongkum1, Petcharleeya Suwanpradit2, Sirachat Vidhyarkorn3
1Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.
Purpose:
This study aimed to determine a low-dose protocol for digital chest tomosynthesis (DTS).
Methods:
Five simulated nodules with a CT number of approximately 100 HU with size diameter of 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 mm were inserted into an anthropomorphic chest phantom (N1 Lungman model), and then scanned by DTS system (Definium 8000) with varying tube voltage, copper filter thickness, and dose ratio. Three radiophotoluminescent (RPL) glass dosimeters, type GD-352 M with a dimension of 1.5 × 12 mm, were used to measure the entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) in each protocol. The effective dose (ED) was calculated using the recorded total dose-area-product (DAP). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was determined for qualitative image quality evaluation. The image criteria and nodule detection capability were scored by two experienced radiologists. The selected low-dose protocol was further applied in a clinical study with 30 pulmonary nodule follow-up patients.
Results:
The average ESAK obtained from the standard default protocol was 1.68 ± 0.15 mGy, while an ESAK of 0.47 ± 0.02 mGy was found for a low-dose protocol. The EDs for the default and low-dose protocols were 313.98 ± 0.72 µSv and 100.55 ± 0.28 µSv, respectively. There were small non-significant differences in the image criteria and nodule detection scoring between the low-dose and default protocols interpreted by two radiologists. The effective dose of 98.87 ± 0.08 µSv was obtained in clinical study after applying the low-dose protocol.
Conclusions:
The low-dose protocol obtained in this study can substantially reduce radiation dose while preserving an acceptable image quality compared to the standard protocol.
