Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Frames: Problem Solving II

Frames: Problem Solving II

Consider a hydraulic hoist supporting a load of 1 kN. Assuming a simplified schematic representation of this frame structure, the force acting on BD and BF members can be determined.

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways

Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways

At the molecular level, visual signals trigger transformations in photopigment molecules, resulting in changes in the photoreceptor cell's membrane potential. The photon's energy level is denoted by its wavelength, with each specific wavelength of visible light associated with a distinct color. The spectral range of visible light, classified as electromagnetic radiation, spans from 380 to 720 nm. Electromagnetic radiation wavelengths exceeding 720 nm fall under the infrared category,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Pretending Not to Know Reveals a Capacity for Model-Based Self-Simulation.

Psychological science·2026

Same author

Part-whole effects in visual number estimation.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

Integration of Recycled Thermosets into Reconstituted Porous Scaffolds using Direct Writing with Pickering Foam Inks.

Macromolecular rapid communications·2025

Same author

Perceiving event structure in brief actions.

Cognitive psychology·2025

Same author

Number adaptation survives spatial displacement.

Current biology : CB·2025

Same author

Knowledge for two<b>When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows…</b> <i>Steven Pinker</i> Scribner, 2025. 384 pp.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025

Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Building word meanings from memories and predictions.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

The Dark Room Problem.

Zekun Sun¹, Chaz Firestone¹

¹Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

|April 17, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Predictive processing aims to reduce prediction errors. However, this can be exploited in predictable environments, posing a challenge for comprehensive psychological theories.

Keywords:

Bayesian brain exploration free energy motivation predictive coding surprise

More Related Videos

Assaying Locomotor Activity to Study Circadian Rhythms and Sleep Parameters in Drosophila

Assaying Locomotor Activity to Study Circadian Rhythms and Sleep Parameters in Drosophila

Published on: September 28, 2010

Light/dark Transition Test for Mice

Light/dark Transition Test for Mice

Published on: November 13, 2006

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

Assaying Locomotor Activity to Study Circadian Rhythms and Sleep Parameters in Drosophila

Assaying Locomotor Activity to Study Circadian Rhythms and Sleep Parameters in Drosophila

Published on: September 28, 2010

Light/dark Transition Test for Mice

Light/dark Transition Test for Mice

Published on: November 13, 2006

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Mind
Psychology

Background:

Predictive Processing (PP) theories posit that the brain aims to minimize prediction errors.
This framework suggests that minimizing surprise is a fundamental principle of cognitive function.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine a potential vulnerability in Predictive Processing theories.
To explore the philosophical implications of prediction-error minimization.
To address challenges for unified psychological theories.

Main Methods:

Philosophical analysis of Predictive Processing principles.
Conceptual examination of environmental predictability.
Discussion of theoretical limitations.

Main Results:

Prediction-error minimization can be achieved by creating highly predictable environments.
Such environments, where 'nothing happens', represent a potential 'hack' or loophole in PP.
This finding poses a significant challenge for theories aiming for universal psychological explanation.

Conclusions:

The ease of 'hacking' prediction-error minimization highlights a critical limitation.
This vulnerability complicates the development of comprehensive 'theories-of-everything' in psychology.
Further theoretical development is needed to address this challenge.