Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

686
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
686
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.8K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.8K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.6K
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

119
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
119
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

6.6K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
6.6K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.8K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is AI making us stupid?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Everyone I Don't Like Is Biased: Affective Evaluations and the Bias Blind Spot.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Judgments of effort and associated cues are influenced by stimulus context.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

Boredom signals deviation from a cognitive homeostatic set point.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Does expecting external memory support cost recognition memory?

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Disclosing sample bias fails to fully correct judgments of partisan extremity.

Cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

4.9K

The Bullshitting Frequency Scale: Development and psychometric properties.

Shane Littrell1, Evan F Risko1, Jonathan A Fugelsang1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

The British Journal of Social Psychology
|April 19, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces the Bullshitting Frequency Scale to measure persuasive and evasive bullshitting. Higher bullshitting frequency correlates with lower honesty and cognitive ability, distinct from lying.

Keywords:
Bullshittinganalytic thinkingbullshitlyingoverclaimingpersuasion

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.0K
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

4.9K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.0K
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Research on receptivity to misinformation often overlooks the act of bullshitting.
  • Existing studies primarily focus on cognitive and dispositional factors of 'bullshit' as a product.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a reliable scale measuring the frequency of everyday bullshitting.
  • To differentiate between persuasive and evasive types of bullshitting.

Main Methods:

  • Construction and validation of the Bullshitting Frequency Scale across four studies.
  • Assessment of correlations between bullshitting frequency and other individual differences.
  • Examination of the scale's distinctiveness from lying and relation to overclaiming and social decision tasks.

Main Results:

  • Bullshitting frequency was negatively associated with sincerity, honesty, cognitive ability, open-minded cognition, and self-regard.
  • The Bullshitting Frequency Scale reliably measures constructs distinct from lying.
  • Bullshitting frequency significantly related to performance on overclaiming and social decision tasks.

Conclusions:

  • The Bullshitting Frequency Scale is a validated tool for assessing everyday bullshitting.
  • Individual differences in honesty and cognitive ability are linked to bullshitting behavior.
  • Understanding bullshitting provides new insights into social interactions and information processing.