Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
Identifying optimal first-line interventions for advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma according to PD-L1
Jie Liu1,2, Chengming Li1,2, Samuel Seery3
1School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Abstract:
This network meta-analysis (NMA), based on one phase II and nine phase III studies, involving 6,124 patients with metastatic NSCLC, indirectly compares Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + chemotherapy (ABC), Atezolizumab + chemotherapy (AC), Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (PC), Pembrolizumab alone, Bevacizumab + chemotherapy (BC) and chemotherapy alone. Each of these is recommended as front-line interventions, according to the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for advanced NSCLC without EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement. Studies were identified through PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and abstracts found in oncology articles. Primary endpoints, i.e., progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with corresponding hazard ratios (HR), objective response rates (ORR) and adverse event (AEs) with odds risk (OR) were pooled according to frequentist network meta-analytical techniques. PD-L1 expression thresholds, as well as non-squamous/squamous were used to determine subgroups. Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy appeared superior to Pembrolizumab alone for PD-L1-high (i.e., TPS≥50%) NSCLC patients. BC might also be specifically recommended as an initial first-line treatment for PD-L1-high, non-squamous NSCLC patients, since BC was not inferior to Pembrolizumab alone. PC and ABC might be preferred for NSCLC patients with intermediate PD-L1 (1% ≤PD-L1, TPS<50%) expression. BC can also be tentatively recommended specifically for PD-L1-intermediate, non-squamous NSCLC patients. Combined immunotherapies can all be recommended for PD-L1-negative (i.e., TPS<1%) NSCLC patients, although especially the ABC combination for non-squamous NSCLC patients, which was superior to PC in regards of PFS. However, PC performed comparable to ABC in the whole population and in all subgroup save this one. More predictive biomarkers could be factored into further analyses to help identifying the most effective treatment regimens for specific patient groups.
Insights
This study compared front-line treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy combinations showed superiority in PD-L1-high patients, guiding personalized treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations has multiple first-line treatment options.
- Determining optimal front-line therapy based on PD-L1 expression and histology is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of various front-line interventions for metastatic NSCLC.
- To identify optimal treatment strategies based on PD-L1 expression levels and NSCLC subtypes.
Main Methods:
- Network meta-analysis of one phase II and nine phase III studies involving 6,124 patients.
- Pooled analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).
- Subgroup analyses based on PD-L1 expression (TPS≥50%, 1%≤TPS<50%, TPS<1%) and histology (non-squamous/squamous).
Main Results:
- Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy combinations were superior to Pembrolizumab alone in PD-L1-high NSCLC.
- Bevacizumab + chemotherapy (BC) was non-inferior to Pembrolizumab alone in PD-L1-high, non-squamous NSCLC.
- Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (PC) and Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + chemotherapy (ABC) were preferred for PD-L1-intermediate NSCLC.
- Combined immunotherapies, particularly ABC for non-squamous NSCLC, showed benefits in PD-L1-negative NSCLC.
Conclusions:
- Treatment selection for metastatic NSCLC should be guided by PD-L1 expression and histology.
- Combined immunotherapies and chemotherapy regimens offer distinct advantages across different PD-L1 expression levels.
- Further research incorporating predictive biomarkers is needed to refine personalized treatment selection.
More Related Videos
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
07:42Patient-Derived Tumor Explants As a "Live" Preclinical Platform for Predicting Drug Resistance in Patients
Published on: February 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...