Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

08:59
Morphology-Based Distinction Between Healthy and Pathological Cells Utilizing Fourier Transforms and Self-Organizing Maps
Published on: October 28, 2018
7.5K
Classifying changes in LN-18 glial cell morphology: a supervised machine learning approach to analyzing cell
Sarah Mbiki1, Jerome McClendon2, Angela Alexander-Bryant3
1Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, 301 Rhodes Research Center, Clemson, 29634, SC, USA. smbiki@clemson.edu.
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
|April 22, 2020
Summary
Machine learning simplifies cell microscopy analysis for in vitro research. Object-based sequential minimal optimization (SMO) achieved the best performance, offering a powerful yet accessible method for evaluating treatment effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cell biology
- Bioinformatics
- Machine learning
Background:
- Cell-based research generates large image datasets for treatment evaluation.
- Traditional end-point assays are error-prone, and existing computational methods are complex.
- Need for simple, powerful machine learning frameworks for cell microscopy data analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate existing machine learning frameworks for cell microscopy image analysis.
- To detail a machine learning pipeline for pixel-based and object-based classification.
- To compare the performance of three classifiers: random forest (RF), sequential minimal optimization (SMO), and Bayesian network (BN).
Main Methods:
- Image preprocessing using smoothing and contrast enhancement in FIJI.
- Pixel-based classification using the Trainable Waikato Segmentation (TWS) tool.
- Object-based classification using the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) interface.
- Performance evaluation of RF, SMO, and BN classifiers using WEKA's experimental explorer.
Main Results:
- Bayesian network (BN) showed the lowest classification accuracy for both pixel-based and object-based models.
- Object-based SMO classifier demonstrated the best performance with a mean absolute error of 0.05.
- TWS and WEKA facilitate classifier creation and training but are not ideal for large datasets.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning frameworks offer a viable alternative to traditional methods for cell microscopy analysis.
- Object-based SMO classification provides a high-performing and accessible approach.
- While TWS and WEKA are user-friendly, scalability for large image datasets requires further consideration.

