Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Percutaneous coronary intervention in women: is sex still an issue?
1Service of Cardiology, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France - stephane.manzosilberman@aphp.fr.
Insights
Women with coronary artery disease face worse outcomes and higher mortality. Despite less obstructive disease, microvascular dysfunction and complications from procedures like percutaneous coronary intervention highlight the need for sex-specific strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Gender Medicine
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) in women exhibits distinct clinical presentations and pathophysiology compared to men.
- Women with CAD experience poorer prognoses, including increased adverse events and higher mortality rates.
- Despite a higher burden of risk factors and comorbidities, women often have less obstructive disease and more favorable plaque characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the sex-based differences in coronary artery disease, focusing on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes.
- To highlight the challenges in diagnosing and managing microvascular dysfunction in women.
- To assess the impact of evolving interventional techniques and devices on sex disparities in CAD.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on sex differences in coronary artery disease.
- Analysis of clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and treatment outcomes in women versus men.
- Evaluation of the role of endothelial dysfunction and microvascular abnormalities.
- Assessment of outcomes related to revascularization procedures and drug-eluting stents (DES).
Main Results:
- Women are less likely to be referred for invasive therapy and face higher complication rates from revascularization procedures.
- Microvascular dysfunction and endothelial abnormalities may contribute to angina symptoms in women, with a worse prognosis.
- While in-hospital mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction is higher in women, advancements in treatments are narrowing the gender gap.
- Female sex is a predictor of increased bleeding risk, necessitating bleeding avoidance strategies.
Conclusions:
- Sex-based differences in CAD pathophysiology, hormonal impacts, and responses to treatments require dedicated investigation.
- Tailored diagnostic and management strategies, including invasive approaches for microvascular dysfunction, are crucial for women.
- Further research and development of sex-specific interventions, particularly focusing on bleeding avoidance and newer stent designs, are essential to improve outcomes for women with CAD.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease among women presents differences in terms of clinical presentation and pathophysiology. To date, women present worse prognoses with more events and higher mortality rate. One the one hand, they are less likely addressed for invasive therapy. One the other hand, revascularization procedures, whether by bypass or by percutaneous coronary intervention, are associated with higher rates of complications and poorer prognosis. Despite higher risk factor burden and comorbidity, women are less affected by obstructive disease and plaque characteristics are more favorable than among men. Abnormalities of endothelial function and micro vascular flow reserve could explain part of the high prevalence of symptoms of angina observed among women. Due to the worse prognosis of microvascular dysfunction, particularly in women, proper diagnosis is mandatory and deserve invasive management. Outcome following ST elevation myocardial infarction is still more severe among women with higher in-hospital mortality, but sex discrepancies are observed even in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. However, improvement of techniques, drugs and devices benefited to both men and women and tend to decrease gender gap. Especially, changes in the design of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) may be particularly important for women. Female sex remains a potent predictor of higher risk of bleeding and vascular complication; thus important efforts should be promoted to develop bleeding avoidance strategies. Sex-based differences still deserve dedicated investigations in terms of physiopathology, particular hormonal impacts, and specific responses to drugs and devices.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
05:31Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care