Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

561
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
561
Multimachine Stability01:25

Multimachine Stability

489
Multimachine stability analysis is crucial for understanding the dynamics and stability of power systems with multiple synchronous machines. The objective is to solve the swing equations for a network of M machines connected to an N-bus power system.
In analyzing the system, the nodal equations represent the relationship between bus voltages, machine voltages, and machine currents. The nodal equation is given by:
489

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-Multimerization of mRNA LNP-Derived Antigen Improves Antibody Responses.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Comprehensive self-antigen screening to assess cross-reactivity in promiscuous T-cell receptors.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Bayesian hierarchical cognitive modeling with the EMC2 package.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Identification of novel DNA sequence motifs that modulate transcription in T cells.

BMC genomics·2026
Same author

A diffusion-based framework for modeling systematic, time-varying cognitive processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

High-value decisions are made quickly, with no consistent effect on accuracy.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.9K

How is multi-tasking different from increased difficulty?

Zachary L Howard1, Nathan J Evans2, Reilly J Innes3

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. zachary.howard@uon.edu.au.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|May 23, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive workload from multitasking and increased task difficulty impair cognitive function similarly by slowing processing rates. However, multitasking also leads to more cautious responses, unlike difficulty increases alone.

Keywords:
Bayesian modelingCognitive workloadComputational modelsMultitasking

More Related Videos

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients
05:23

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients

Published on: March 11, 2021

2.7K
Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.9K
Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients
05:23

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients

Published on: March 11, 2021

2.7K
Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Modern technology (e.g., in-car navigation, smartphones) increases cognitive workload.
  • Task overload can impair cognitive abilities due to resource overuse.
  • Both multitasking and increased single-task difficulty can lead to overload effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how cognitive load manipulations (multitasking vs. difficulty) affect cognitive functioning.
  • To compare the cognitive impairments resulting from these distinct load manipulations.
  • To utilize quantitative cognitive modeling for detailed analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel lab-based Detection Response Task (DRT) to measure workload.
  • Paired the DRT with a Multiple Object Tracking Task (MOT) to manipulate cognitive load.
  • Manipulated load by altering within-task difficulty or adding a secondary task.

Main Results:

  • Both multitasking and increased difficulty led to similar cognitive impairments, primarily through diminished processing rates.
  • Adding a second task (multitasking) induced more cautious response strategies compared to difficulty increases alone.
  • Quantitative cognitive modeling supported these findings.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive impairments from multitasking and increased difficulty share common mechanisms (reduced processing rates).
  • Multitasking introduces distinct strategic adjustments (caution) not seen with difficulty changes.
  • Caution is advised when comparing multitasking and difficulty-based workload impairments, especially using mean-based measures.