Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: cost-effectiveness systematic review
Cristian Eduardo Navarro1, Eliana Ordóñez-Callamand2, Juan Pablo Alzate3
1Unit of Clinical Neurology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá. Colombia. Grupo de Investigación en Neurología de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia-NEURONAL, Bogotá. Colombia.. cenavarroc@unal.edu.co.
Cost-effectiveness studies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis therapies show significant methodological variability. Results are often contradictory, making it impossible to definitively determine the most cost-effective disease-modifying treatment.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Neurology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) necessitates evaluating the economic value of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).
- Numerous DMTs are available, each with varying costs and clinical effectiveness, prompting cost-effectiveness analyses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and describe cost-effectiveness studies of DMTs for RRMS.
- To identify methodological strengths and weaknesses in existing economic evaluations of RRMS treatments.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness analyses from 2010-2017.
- Searched multiple databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and specialized economic evaluation registries.
- Assessed study quality using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument.
Main Results:
- Nine studies were included, exhibiting substantial methodological variability.
- Some studies indicated no first-line therapy was cost-effective, while others showed dominance for interferon beta-1b and teriflunomide.
- Second- and third-line analyses presented mixed results for dimethyl fumarate, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab, with noted sponsorship bias in many trials.
Conclusions:
- Cost-effectiveness studies for RRMS DMTs display high methodological variability and often yield contradictory findings.
- The current evidence base does not permit a definitive conclusion on the most cost-effective DMT for RRMS.
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

