Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

06:36
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
665
[Risk factors for class II dental restoration survival:a practice-based study]
Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Tandheelkunde
|May 28, 2020
Summary
This study analyzed 31,472 class II restorations, finding a 7.8% annual failure rate. Patient, tooth, and practice factors significantly influence restoration survival, highlighting the need for personalized dental care.
Area of Science:
- Dental Restorations
- Clinical Dentistry
- Evidence-Based Dentistry
Background:
- Class II restorations are common dental procedures.
- Understanding factors influencing their longevity is crucial for clinical practice.
- Variability in outcomes necessitates investigation into contributing variables.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of class II restorations.
- To identify practice, patient, tooth, and restoration-related factors affecting survival.
- To determine the annual failure rate (AFR) of these restorations.
Main Methods:
- Practice-based cohort study design.
- Analysis of electronic patient files from 11 general dental practices in the Netherlands.
- Inclusion of 31,472 class II restorations placed between January 2015 and October 2017.
Main Results:
- Mean annual failure rate (AFR) was 7.8% at 2 years.
- Significant variation in AFRs observed among operators (3.6%–11.4%).
- Patient factors (age, health, caries risk, parafunctional habits) and tooth/restoration factors (fracture vs. caries) increased reintervention risk.
Conclusions:
- Numerous risk factors at practice, patient, and tooth levels impact class II restoration survival.
- Restorations placed due to fracture showed higher failure rates than those for caries.
- Operator variability underscores the importance of standardized techniques and individualized patient management.

