Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

4.0K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
4.0K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

4.4K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

UXpedite Learning Design: Bridging Instructional Design and Software Engineering for Effective Augmented Reality Learning Environments.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2025
Same author

Pupillary Responses for Cognitive Load Measurement to Classify Difficulty Levels in an Educational Video Game: Empirical Study.

JMIR serious games·2021
Same author

Boron and Coumaphos Residues in Hive Materials Following Treatments for the Control of Aethina tumida Murray.

PloS one·2016
Same journal

Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Are 7-point Likert scales preferable to 5-point scales in language research?

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Generative psychometrics via AI-GENIE: Automatic item generation and validation with network-integrated evaluation.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

The performance of Bayesian fit measures in detecting misspecified multilevel structural equation modeling.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.5K

Testing multiple polynomial models for eye-tracker calibration.

Carlos Lara-Alvarez1, Fernando Gonzalez-Herrera2

  • 1Information Technology Laboratory, Center for Research and Advanced Studies, Parque Cientifico y Tecnologico Tecnotam Km, 5.5 carretera Cd. Victoria - Soto La Marina C.P., 87130, Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. c.alberto.lara@gmail.com.

Behavior Research Methods
|May 30, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a robust eye-tracker calibration method using MMransac and model selection criteria. This approach improves accuracy by effectively handling outliers and preventing overfitting in polynomial models.

Keywords:
Akaike information criterionCalibrationEye tracking

More Related Videos

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking
07:26

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking

Published on: September 26, 2019

8.1K
A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

18.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.5K
Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking
07:26

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking

Published on: September 26, 2019

8.1K
A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

18.0K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Vision
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Traditional eye-tracker calibration assumes error-free data, which can lead to significant bias if violated.
  • Polynomial functions are common for eye-tracker calibration, but high degrees risk overfitting and reduced smoothness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust eye-tracker calibration algorithm that addresses data outliers.
  • To enable effective model selection for polynomial eye-tracker calibration, even with erroneous data points.

Main Methods:

  • Modified Random Sample Consensus (MMransac) algorithm for robust fitting.
  • Integration of model selection criteria, including Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Kullback Information Criterion (KIC).
  • Testing the algorithmic approach with various model selection criteria.

Main Results:

  • The proposed MMransac algorithm achieves robust eye-tracker calibrations.
  • Combined robust fitting and model selection yield more accurate calibrations.
  • AIC and KIC prove effective in guiding model selection for improved accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The combined robust fitting and model selection approach significantly enhances eye-tracker calibration accuracy.
  • This method provides a reliable solution for eye-tracker calibration in the presence of data outliers.
  • The algorithm facilitates better model selection for polynomial mappings in eye-tracking systems.