Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

647
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
647
Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

93.0K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
93.0K
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

166
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
166
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

26.2K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.2K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.0K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.0K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

2.5K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Support in Decision-Making for All.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

Supported Decision-Making for Clinical Research Participants with Mental Illness.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

The importance of residual newborn screening dried blood spots, 2025 revision: A position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2025
Same author

The Reproductive Injustices of Abortion Bans for Disability.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2023
Same author

Federalism for Bioethics?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2023
Same author

Mask Mandates and Dilemmas of Disability Difference.

The Hastings Center report·2022
Same journal

Sentience. Not Necessarily a Problem?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

No Need to Feel.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

From Mollusks to Machines: An Ethical Framework Focused on the Urgency of Extreme Suffering.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

Sentience and Why It Matters.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The Wrong Motives for Potentially Harming a Being.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

5.9K

Commentary: Beyond Common or Uncommon Morality.

Leslie Francis

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics : CQ : the International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees
    |June 3, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This commentary examines Rosamond Rhodes's specialist view of medical ethics for physicians. While agreeing that medical ethics are distinct from common morality, it disputes that physician ethics derive solely from professional practice or consensus.

    More Related Videos

    Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
    05:21

    Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

    Published on: January 7, 2019

    8.2K
    The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
    06:51

    The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

    Published on: April 6, 2018

    8.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

    Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
    08:01

    Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

    Published on: October 28, 2020

    5.9K
    Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
    05:21

    Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

    Published on: January 7, 2019

    8.2K
    The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
    06:51

    The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

    Published on: April 6, 2018

    8.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Philosophy of Medicine
    • Professional Ethics

    Background:

    • Rosamond Rhodes proposes a specialist view of medical ethics, focusing on physicians.
    • This view posits that medical ethics are distinct from common morality.
    • Rhodes's theory includes a negative thesis and a two-part positive thesis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically analyze Rosamond Rhodes's specialist account of medical ethics.
    • To evaluate the claims made in Rhodes's negative and positive theses.
    • To offer a commentary on the distinctiveness of physician ethics.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of ethical theories.
    • Critical examination of arguments presented by Rhodes.
    • Comparative analysis of medical ethics and common morality.

    Main Results:

    • Agreement with Rhodes's negative thesis: medical ethics are not derived from common morality.
    • Disagreement with Rhodes's positive thesis: medical ethics are not solely derived from the nature of physician practice.
    • Disagreement with Rhodes's positive thesis: medical ethics are not exclusively based on an overlapping consensus of medical professionals.

    Conclusions:

    • Medical ethics possess a unique foundation separate from general moral principles.
    • The basis for medical ethics requires further exploration beyond professional practice and consensus.
    • Rhodes's specialist view, while insightful, presents aspects requiring deeper consideration.