Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

685
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
685
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

743
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
743

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What's Yours Is Mine: Spontaneous Representation and Memorization of Co-Actor's Goals.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Item-specific source misattribution drives short-term source amnesia.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Sensory reliance in visual working memory across active and passive states.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Correction: The relation matters: Visual working memory-guided attention can be modulated by causality between memory items.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

I'll believe it unless it's too absurd: Spontaneous visual perspective-taking as prior-based heuristic inference.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Working memory encoding of attended information is adaptive to future relevance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

How does optical blur affect audiovisual speech perception and emotion perception?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Is there a cost in forming statistical summary representations at multiple spatial scales?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 18, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K

Visual working-memory capacity load does not modulate distractor processing.

Nailang Yao1, Yang Guo1, Yang Liu1

  • 1Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Xixi Campus, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310007, People's Republic of China.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|June 13, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual working memory load does not appear to influence selective attention or distractor processing in perception. This study found no modulation of distractor processing by visual working memory load across multiple experimental conditions.

Keywords:
Distractor processingSelective attentionVisual working memory

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.6K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 18, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.6K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Selective attention research has explored how visual working memory (WM) load affects distractor processing.
  • Three hypotheses exist: perceptual-load, resolution, and domain-specific, with differing predictions on WM's role.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of visual working memory load on distractor processing in perception.
  • To differentiate between competing hypotheses regarding WM's impact on attention.

Main Methods:

  • A flanker task was integrated into the maintenance phase of visual working memory tasks.
  • Parameters such as task settings, perceptual load, stimulus properties, WM load, content overlap, and exposure time were systematically manipulated across nine experiments.

Main Results:

  • Across 11 out of 12 sub-experiments, visual working memory load consistently failed to modulate distractor processing.
  • This finding held true despite systematic variations in experimental parameters.

Conclusions:

  • The results challenge the notion that visual working memory load directly impacts distractor processing in perception.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the complex interplay between working memory and selective attention.