Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Coproparasitoscopic Examination of Dog Stools for Control and Prevention of Zoonotic Parasite Diseases
Published on: December 15, 2023
Comparative evaluation of field samples using 2 in-clinic assays for heartworm antigen detection in dogs
K W Burton1, J Liu1, J P Drexel1
1IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., One IDEXX Drive, Westbrook, ME, 04092, United States.
Abstract:
Dirofilaria immitis (heartworm) antigen testing is routinely performed in veterinary practices to detect canine heartworm infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of two in-clinic assays to detect heartworm antigen on field samples from practices in heartworm endemic regions. Veterinary staff in 3 practices located in the Southern United States performed a side by side comparison of the SNAP® 4Dx® Plus Test (IDEXX) and the VETSCAN FLEX4® Test (Zoetis) on samples from canine patients presented for vector-borne disease screening. Assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The remaining plasma sample was submitted for confirmatory testing using the PetChek® Heartworm Test (IDEXX) including immune complex dissociation (ICD) by heat treatment. A total of 232 samples were evaluated by the two in-clinic assays and PetChek Test. SNAP 4Dx Plus was significantly more sensitive for the detection of heartworm antigen in this study; sensitivity was 97.4 % for the SNAP 4Dx Plus test and 76.9 % for VETSCAN FLEX4 test (p < 0.01). The specificity of both tests was 99.5 %. This study reveals significant difference in detecting canine heartworm antigen in field samples.
More Related Videos
07:40Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020
08:10Evaluation of a Universal Nested Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Detection of Lyssaviruses
Published on: May 2, 2019