Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
Published on: September 5, 2019
Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction.
Anne Abeillé1, Barbara Hemforth1, Elodie Winckel2
1LLF, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Paris, France.
Syntactic island constraints are not purely syntactic. Extraction acceptability depends on discourse factors, challenging universal grammar theories and highlighting construction-specific analysis for long-distance dependencies.
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Syntax
- Semantics
- Discourse Analysis
Background:
- Syntactic island constraints were proposed as universal, purely syntactic rules governing long-distance dependencies.
- These constraints predict uniform behavior across different constructions and languages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the subject island constraint in English and French across different constructions.
- To compare extraction from nominal subjects versus nominal objects in relative clauses and wh-questions.
- To challenge purely syntactic accounts by considering discourse-related factors.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of extraction from subjects and objects in English and French relative clauses and wh-questions.
- Utilizing parallel materials across constructions and languages.
- Developing a discourse-based theory to explain extraction patterns.
Main Results:
- Extraction from subjects is unacceptable in wh-questions (both languages) and with preposition stranding (English).
- Extraction of whole prepositional phrases from subjects in relative clauses is acceptable in both languages, similar to extraction from objects.
- Extraction acceptability is influenced by the discourse status of the extracted element (focus vs. non-focus).
Conclusions:
- Subject island effects are not solely determined by syntactic constraints.
- The discourse status of the extracted element (focus in wh-questions, non-focus in relative clauses) interacts with the subject's discourse status.
- Extraction patterns are construction-specific, necessitating analysis that incorporates discourse functions rather than relying on universal syntactic rules alone.
More Related Videos
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting
Components of Language
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Role-Based Identity