Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

162
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
162
Production Efficiency01:01

Production Efficiency

17.8K
Net production efficiency (NPE) is the efficiency at which organisms assimilate energy into biomass for the next trophic level. Due to low metabolic rates and less energy spent on thermoregulatory processes, the NPE of ectotherms (cold-blooded animals) is 10 times higher than endotherms (warm-blooded animals).
17.8K
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

81
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
81
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

38.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.8K
Compensation Mechanisms01:28

Compensation Mechanisms

1.8K
The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
1.8K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children adapt their information search to goal and statistical structure of a problem.

Developmental psychology·2024
Same author

Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Young children's adaptive partner choice in cooperation and competition contexts.

Child development·2023
Same author

Flexible Cultural Learning Through Action Coordination.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023
Same author

Smart or just lucky? Inferring question-asking competence from strategies' efficiency versus effectiveness.

Developmental psychology·2023
Same author

The problem with solutions: A commentary of "Blind alleys and fruitful pathways in the comparative study of cultural cognition" by Andrew Whiten.

Physics of life reviews·2022
Same journal

A longitudinal study on the intergenerational transmission mechanism of music preference on adolescents' emotion regulation.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

A cross-cultural adaptation and content validity assessment of the Czech Version Kiddy-KINDL Questionnaire.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Relationship between playing golf and cognitive function in old age.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Chatbot language style matching and reuse intention in service failure: A communication accommodation theory explanation.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Reactive stress tolerance and reaction speed in the adaptive determination test as predictors of cadets' combat training performance.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

CSR disclosure authenticity in food companies: The moderating effect of consumer attribution tendencies on trust formation and reputation enhancement pathways.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Efficiency is prioritised over fairness when distributing joint actions.

James W A Strachan1, Georgina Török2

  • 1Central European University, Budapest, Hungary; Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy.

Acta Psychologica
|August 10, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People prioritize joint action efficiency over fairness in task distribution. Even when it means partners incur higher costs, individuals choose options that maximize overall task success, demonstrating a rational decision-making approach.

Keywords:
Decision-makingEfficiencyFairnessJoint actionTask distribution

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Individuals naturally seek to maximize action efficiency, minimizing personal costs.
  • In joint actions, efficiency (coefficiency) is prioritized, even at individual cost.
  • The willingness to sacrifice a partner's efficiency for joint gain, considering fairness, is unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether individuals unilaterally sacrifice partner efficiency for joint gains.
  • To explore the role of fairness in joint action task distribution.
  • To determine if rational decision-making prioritizes overall efficiency over fairness.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to examine task distribution choices.
  • Participants distributed a motor task with fair and unfair labor splits.
  • The impact of reciprocity was assessed across experiments.

Main Results:

  • Participants consistently maximized joint action efficiency (coefficiency).
  • This maximization occurred regardless of the fairness of labor distribution.
  • Individual action costs and fairness considerations did not alter choices.

Conclusions:

  • Joint action decision-making prioritizes overall efficiency.
  • Rational frameworks favor maximizing coefficiency over individual costs or fairness.
  • Fairness is not a primary driver when joint efficiency is at stake.