Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Conformable Wearable Electrodes: From Fabrication to Electrophysiological Assessment
Published on: July 22, 2022
[Clinical differential indication : Wearables vs implantables]
Thorsten Lewalter1, Clemens Jilek2, Carsten Israel3
1Klinik für Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Peter Osypka Herzzentrum, Internistisches Klinikum München Süd, Am Isarkanal 36, 81379, München, Deutschland. thorsten.lewalter@ikms.de.
Abstract:
In order to document arrhythmias, indicated due to symptoms or for prognostic purposes, both invasive and noninvasive possibilities for ECG monitoring are available. The choice of the device for monitoring depends mainly on the frequency of arrhythmias. If they occur less than once a month, long-term monitoring becomes necessary which either continuously monitors the rhythm by an implantable device (implantables) or by wearable systems (wearables) which usually register the ECG discontinuously. Because wearables, e.g. smartphones, are basically ubiquitously available, they may be used for ECG monitoring. This paper comments on the use of implantables and wearables for the detection of atrial fibrillation and the documentation of symptomatic arrhythmias in syncope or palpitations.
More Related Videos
15:00Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
08:42The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice
Published on: July 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Signaling
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...