Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children's susceptibility to content generated by artificial intelligence.

Technology in society·2026
Same author

The influence of individual characteristics on children's learning with a social robot versus a human.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Perinatal Imaging in Partnership with Families (PIPKIN): Longitudinal cohort study protocol.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Electrophysiological responses to digit stimulation in a tactile oddball paradigm.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2024
Same author

Trajectories of brain and behaviour development in the womb, at birth and through infancy.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Genes, genomes, and developmental process.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

26.3K

Individual differences in anticipatory mu rhythm modulation are associated with executive function and processing

Staci Meredith Weiss1, Rebecca N Laconi2, Peter J Marshall2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Temple University, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. smeredithweiss@gmail.com.

Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
|August 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Brain oscillations, specifically the sensorimotor mu rhythm, are linked to cognitive control. Anticipatory changes in mu rhythm during tactile stimulation predict processing speed and goal-directed behavior.

Keywords:
AlphaAttentionExecutive functionMu rhythmRegulationTactile

More Related Videos

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

15.8K
Disruption of Frontal Lobe Neural Synchrony During Cognitive Control by Alcohol Intoxication
09:26

Disruption of Frontal Lobe Neural Synchrony During Cognitive Control by Alcohol Intoxication

Published on: February 6, 2019

21.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

26.3K
Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

15.8K
Disruption of Frontal Lobe Neural Synchrony During Cognitive Control by Alcohol Intoxication
09:26

Disruption of Frontal Lobe Neural Synchrony During Cognitive Control by Alcohol Intoxication

Published on: February 6, 2019

21.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Growing interest in brain oscillations for behavior regulation.
  • Sensorimotor mu rhythm (8-14 Hz) is a key brain oscillation.
  • Understanding the link between brain activity and cognitive functions is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Examine relationships between cognitive abilities and brain oscillatory activity.
  • Investigate changes in mu rhythm during tactile stimulation anticipation and response.
  • Assess the role of mu rhythm modulation in behavioral control.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) from 40 adults.
  • Utilized a task with visuospatial cues for tactile stimulation of the hand.
  • Analyzed lateralized changes in mu power during anticipation and response phases.

Main Results:

  • Lateralized mu power changes post-stimulation correlated with reaction time.
  • Contralateral anticipatory mu power reduction linked to processing speed.
  • Ipsilateral mu power changes during anticipation related to flanker and card sort task performance.

Conclusions:

  • Mu rhythm modulation during tactile anticipation relates to processing speed.
  • Anticipatory mu rhythm changes reflect broader attentional control abilities.
  • Selective attention to bodily locations via mu rhythm is an index of attentional regulation.