Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025
Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
Published on: November 30, 2022
Do Head-Mounted Augmented Reality Devices Affect Muscle Activity and Eye Strain of Utility Workers Who Do Procedural
Richard W Marklin1, Ashley M Toll2, Eric H Bauman3
15505 Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Objective:
The objective was to determine the effect of two head-mounted display (HMD) augmented reality (AR) devices on muscle activity and eye strain of electric utility workers. The AR devices were the Microsoft HoloLens and RealWear HMT-1.
Background:
The HoloLens is an optical see-through device. The HMT-1 has a small display that is mounted to the side of one eye of the user.
Method:
Twelve power plant operators and 13 manhole workers conducted their normal procedural tasks on-site in three conditions: HoloLens, HMT-1, and "No AR" (regular method). Duration of test trials ranged up to 30 s for operators and up to 10 min for manhole workers. Mean and peak values of surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals from eight neck muscles were measured. A small eye camera measured blink rate of the right eye.
Results:
In general, there were no differences in sEMG activity between the AR and "No AR" conditions for both groups of workers. For the manhole workers, the HoloLens blink rate was 8 to 11 blinks per min lower than the HMT-1 in two tasks and 6.5 fewer than "No AR" in one task. Subjective assessment of the two AR devices did not vary in general.
Conclusion:
The decrease in blink rate with the HoloLens may expose utility manhole workers to risk of eye strain or dry-eye syndrome.
Application:
HMD AR devices should be tested thoroughly with respect to risk of eye strain before deployment by manhole workers for long-duration procedural work.
