Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Importance of Need for Affiliation01:25

Importance of Need for Affiliation

172
The need for affiliation is a fundamental human motive that drives individuals to form and maintain interpersonal relationships. This universal drive varies in intensity among individuals due to genetic predispositions and life experiences, shaping it into a relatively stable personality trait. Social inclusion enhances emotional well-being by fulfilling the need for affiliation, whereas social exclusion leads to distress, negative emotions, and cognitive impairments.Psychological and Emotional...
172
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

31.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.4K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

48.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.3K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

38.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.8K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

47.6K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
47.6K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

35.1K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing leader identity across the lifespan.

New directions for student leadership·2023
Same author

Latent profile analysis of adolescent temperament: Relations to happiness and health in adulthood.

Journal of adolescence·2023
Same author

Go for the gold: Hurdles and winning strategies for conducting longitudinal and nonlinear research in undergraduate leader development.

New directions for student leadership·2022
Same author

Positive family relationships across 30 years: Predicting adult health and happiness.

Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)·2022
Same author

Leader development begins at home: Overparenting harms adolescent leader emergence.

The Journal of applied psychology·2019
Same author

Nonverbal Skill, Personal Charisma, and Initial Attraction.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.3K

Why Followership?

Ronald E Riggio1

  • 1Claremont McKenna College.

New Directions for Student Leadership
|August 25, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Followership is often viewed negatively, but understanding followers is crucial. This work emphasizes the importance of studying followership with the same depth as leadership.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.3K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Organizational Behavior
  • Social Psychology
  • Leadership Studies

Background:

  • Followership is frequently characterized by negative attributes like passivity and lower status.
  • Existing research predominantly focuses on leadership, neglecting the critical role of followership.
  • A balanced understanding requires examining leaders, followers, and their contextual interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge negative perceptions of followership.
  • To advocate for a deeper academic and practical understanding of followers.
  • To provide a framework for explaining the significance of followership to diverse audiences.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing literature on leadership and followership.
  • Exploration of the interconnectedness of leadership, followership, and context.
  • Development of arguments for the parity of study between leaders and followers.

Main Results:

  • Followership is an integral component of the leadership dynamic, not a subordinate role.
  • Negative stereotypes of followers obscure their potential contributions and importance.
  • A comprehensive understanding of organizational effectiveness necessitates a parallel focus on followership.

Conclusions:

  • Elevating the study of followership is essential for a holistic view of organizational behavior.
  • Recognizing the value and complexity of followership can enhance leadership effectiveness.
  • Further research and discourse are needed to reframe followership in a more accurate and positive light.