Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 10, 2025

Sub-nanometer Resolution Imaging with Amplitude-modulation Atomic Force Microscopy in Liquid
Published on: December 20, 2016
On the resolution of subsurface atomic force microscopy and its implications for subsurface feature sizing
Daniele Piras1, Paul L M J van Neer1, Rutger M T Thijssen1
1Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, TNO, 2628 CK Delft, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Ultrasound atomic force microscopy (AFM) has received considerable interest due to its subsurface imaging capabilities, particularly for nanostructure imaging. The local contact stiffness variation due to the presence of a subsurface feature is the origin of the imaging contrast. Several research studies have demonstrated subsurface imaging capabilities with promising resolution. However, there is limited literature available about the definition of spatial resolution in subsurface AFM. The changes in contact stiffness and their link to the subsurface resolution are not well understood. We propose a quantitative approach to assess the resolution in subsurface AFM imaging. We have investigated the influences of several parameters of interest on the lateral resolution. The quantification of the subsurface feature size can be based on threshold criteria (full width at half maximum and Rayleigh criteria). Simulations and experimental measurements were compared, revealing that the optimal choice of parameter settings for surface topography AFM is suboptimal for subsurface AFM imaging.
More Related Videos
05:04Author Spotlight: Introduction to Active Probe Atomic Force Microscopy with Quattro-Parallel Cantilever Arrays
Published on: June 13, 2023
08:58Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
Published on: December 2, 2022