Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.9K
Types of Limits II01:24

Types of Limits II

81
When observing how a curve behaves near a specific point along the horizontal axis, there are cases where the curve’s height increases or decreases without limit as the position draws closer to that point. The curve does not settle at any particular value; instead, the values grow more extreme—upward or downward—the nearer they get. No defined value exists exactly at that location, yet the surrounding behavior becomes more dramatic, indicating a sharp change in direction.The...
81
Types of Limits I01:23

Types of Limits I

86
Limits are a key mathematical concept for understanding how functions behave as their input approaches specific values, particularly when the function is undefined. They help reveal trends and discontinuities by examining the values a function approaches rather than its actual value.One-sided limits focus on the direction from which a value is approached. When a function behaves differently depending on whether the input approaches from the left or the right, the two one-sided limits may not...
86
Limits at Infinity01:24

Limits at Infinity

84
The function that decreases as the input becomes very large provides a clear example of how mathematical functions can behave at extreme values. When the input increases continuously, the output becomes smaller and smaller, getting closer to a particular fixed value. Although the output never actually reaches this value, it moves nearer to it without limit. This behavior is a fundamental concept in understanding how functions behave as the input grows indefinitely. The graphical representation...
84
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

30.7K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
30.7K
Second Uniqueness Theorem01:16

Second Uniqueness Theorem

2.5K
Consider a region consisting of several individual conductors with a definite charge density in the region between these conductors. The second uniqueness theorem states that if the total charge on each conductor and the charge density in the in-between region are known, then the electric field can be uniquely determined.
In contrast, consider that the electric field is non-unique and apply Gauss's law in divergence form in the region between the conductors and the integral form to the surface...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Many-Body Anti-Zeno Thermalization and Zeno Determinism in Monitored Hamiltonian Dynamics.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Correlated Noise Estimation with Quantum Sensor Networks.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Complexity of quantum tomography from genuine non-Gaussian entanglement.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Autonomous recognition of erroneous raw key bit bias in quantum key distribution.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

An overview of CV-MDI-QKD.

Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)·2025
Same author

Holographic deep thermalization for secure and efficient quantum random state generation.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 9, 2025

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.8K

Ultimate Limits for Multiple Quantum Channel Discrimination.

Quntao Zhuang1,2, Stefano Pirandola3

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.

Physical Review Letters
|September 10, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We establish a lower limit for quantum channel discrimination error probability. This bound is achievable for symmetric channels and shows entanglement offers significant advantages in quantum sensing and communication.

More Related Videos

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.5K
Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 9, 2025

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.8K
Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.5K
Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.9K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Theory
  • Quantum Communication
  • Quantum Sensing

Background:

  • Quantum hypothesis testing for states is understood, but quantum channel discrimination remains challenging.
  • Complications arise from input entanglement and adaptive strategies in channel discrimination.
  • Understanding channel discrimination limits is crucial for quantum protocols and applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a lower limit for the ultimate error probability in discriminating multiple quantum channels.
  • To investigate the achievability of this lower bound.
  • To explore the role of entanglement in quantum channel discrimination.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of a lower bound for quantum channel discrimination error probability.
  • Analysis of bound achievability for channels with specific symmetries.
  • Application to the channel position finding problem.

Main Results:

  • A general lower bound for the error probability in discriminating multiple quantum channels is established.
  • The lower bound is shown to be achievable for channels possessing certain symmetries.
  • Entanglement provides a significant advantage over non-entanglement strategies for channel discrimination.

Conclusions:

  • The established lower bound provides fundamental insights into the limits of quantum channel discrimination.
  • The findings have practical implications for quantum sensing, communication, and spectroscopy.
  • Entanglement is a key resource for enhancing performance in quantum channel discrimination tasks.