Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

09:36
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
Published on: June 4, 2020
3.4K
Does the Grip Width Affect the Bench Press Performance of Paralympic Powerlifters?
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
|September 11, 2020
Summary
Choosing the right grip width in the bench press is crucial for Paralympic powerlifting athletes. A 1.5 times biacromial distance (BAD) grip optimizes performance by increasing movement velocity and force production.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Paralympic Athletics
Background:
- Bench press performance is critical in Paralympic powerlifting.
- Optimizing technique, including grip width, can enhance athlete capabilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of varying grip widths on bench press performance in male Paralympic powerlifting athletes.
- To analyze effects on maximal dynamic and isometric strength, mean propulsive velocity, and muscle activation.
Main Methods:
- Twelve male Paralympic powerlifters performed maximal dynamic and isometric strength tests.
- Mean propulsive velocity (MPV) and time to achieve maximal isometric strength (MIS) were measured using four grip widths (biacromial distance [BAD], 1.3 BAD, 1.5 BAD, 81 cm).
- Electromyography assessed muscle activation in the pectoralis major (sternal and clavicular portions), and anterior deltoid, triceps brachii long head.
Main Results:
- A 1.5 BAD grip width showed a tendency for greater force generation and MPV.
- Grip width significantly affected MPV at 25% maximal dynamic strength load and time to achieve MIS.
- Moderate effects on muscle myoelectric activation were observed, with 1.3 BAD and 1.5 BAD showing greater activation in specific pectoralis major portions.
Conclusions:
- Specific grip width selection is vital for enhancing Paralympic powerlifting performance.
- Wider grips, particularly 1.5 BAD, can improve movement velocity and force production.
- Optimized grip width contributes to faster contractile responses and greater primary muscle activation.

