Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development01:30

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

196
Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
196

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

EEG N1 Specialization to Print in Chinese Primary School Students: Developmental Trajectories, Longitudinal Changes, and Individual Differences.

Child development·2025
Same author

Bridging concurrent multitasking, task switching, and complex multitasking: The general and specific skills involved.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Learning fast and accurate absolute pitch judgment in adulthood.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

An early perceptual locus of absolute pitch.

Psychophysiology·2022
Same author

Visual and visual association abilities predict skilled reading performance: The case of music sight-reading.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2022
Same author

Are there associations between daily multitasking experience and multitasking performance?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2022
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.8K

Gender differences in multitasking experience and performance.

Kelvin Fh Lui1, Ken Hm Yip1, Alan C-N Wong1

  • 1Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin NT, Hong Kong.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|September 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Men outperform women in concurrent multitasking, challenging stereotypes. This gender difference in dual-tasking stems from processing speed, not multitasking experience.

Keywords:
Gender differencedual-task performanceexperiencemultitaskingtask switching

More Related Videos

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
07:00

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

2.1K
Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats
09:31

Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats

Published on: September 15, 2017

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.8K
Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
07:00

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

2.1K
Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats
09:31

Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats

Published on: September 15, 2017

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Stereotypes suggest women excel at multitasking, but research yields mixed results.
  • Previous studies used varied multitasking paradigms (concurrent vs. sequential).
  • This study investigated gender differences in specific multitasking types and experience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine if men are better at concurrent multitasking and women at task switching.
  • To compare multitasking experience between genders.
  • To determine the role of processing speed and experience in observed gender differences.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized concurrent (dual-task) and sequential (task-switching) paradigms.
  • Assessed multitasking experience via computer monitoring, questionnaires, and inventories.
  • Measured processing speed as a potential mediating factor.

Main Results:

  • Men exhibited smaller concurrent multitasking costs than women.
  • No significant gender difference was found in sequential multitasking costs.
  • Men reported more video game multitasking; women reported more music, messaging, and web surfing multitasking.

Conclusions:

  • Men demonstrate an advantage in concurrent multitasking, linked to cognitive processing speed.
  • Gender differences in multitasking performance are not explained by experience alone.
  • Findings highlight the influence of individual cognitive abilities on multitasking performance.