Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Induction01:16

Induction

5.3K
An emf is induced when the magnetic field in a coil is changed by pushing a bar magnet into or out of the coil. emfs of opposite signs are produced by motion in opposite directions, and the directions of emfs are also reversed by reversing poles. The same results are produced if the coil is moved rather than the magnet—it is the relative motion that is important. The faster the motion, the greater the emf. Additionally, there is no emf when the magnet is stationary relative to the coil.
A...
5.3K
Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)01:27

Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)

4.0K
α,β-Unsaturated carbonyl compounds with two electrophilic sites, the carbonyl carbon, and the β carbon, are susceptible to nucleophilic attack via two modes: conjugate or 1,4-addition and direct or 1,2-addition.
Conjugate addition results in a thermodynamically stable product. The reaction retains the stronger C=O bond at the expense of the weaker C=C π bond. The process is slow as the β carbon is less electrophilic than the carbonyl carbon.
Direct addition products are...
4.0K
Inductors01:11

Inductors

789
An inductor is a passive component built to store energy within its magnetic field. It can be fabricated by coiling a wire around a magnetic core. When current is permitted to flow through this inductor, it is observed that the voltage across the inductor is directly proportional to the time rate of change of the current. Mathematically,
789
Inductors01:20

Inductors

5.8K
An inductor, also known as a choke, is a circuit component created to have a specific inductance. Inductors are among the crucial circuit components used in modern electronics, along with resistors and capacitors. They serve as a barrier against changes in a circuit's current. An inductor tends to suppress current changes in an alternating-current circuit that are faster than desired. In a direct-current circuit, an inductor aids in preserving a constant current despite changes in the...
5.8K
Mathematical Induction01:29

Mathematical Induction

132
Mathematical induction is a structured method of proof used to confirm the truth of statements involving natural numbers. Consider the sum of the first n natural numbers:This formula describes a pattern that appears to hold true as more terms are added. To verify that it is valid for all natural numbers, mathematical induction proceeds in two essential steps. The first is the base case, where the formula is tested for the initial value, typically n = 1. Substituting into both sides confirms the...
132
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

64.2K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
64.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trapped by selective attention: The role of attentional processes in the emergence and prevention of learning traps.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

How Convincing Is a Crowd? Quantifying the Persuasiveness of a Consensus for Different Individuals and Types of Claims.

Psychological science·2025
Same author

Learning traps and change blindness in dynamic environments.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

What do our sampling assumptions affect: How we encode data or how we reason from it?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same author

Are logical intuitions only make-believe? Reexamining the logic-liking effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same author

Who is sensitive to selection biases in inductive reasoning?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Induction and Monitoring of Active Delayed Type Hypersensitivity DTH in Rats
13:26

Induction and Monitoring of Active Delayed Type Hypersensitivity DTH in Rats

Published on: July 19, 2007

18.2K

Adding Types, But Not Tokens, Affects Property Induction.

Belinda Xie1, Danielle J Navarro1, Brett K Hayes1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of New South Wales.

Cognitive Science
|September 17, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adding new types to a sample enhances property generalization to similar items, while adding repeated tokens has minimal impact. This finding is crucial for understanding how we generalize novel properties from evidence.

Keywords:
Bayesian modelsGeneralizationInductive reasoningRepetitionsSamplesTightening

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.1K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Induction and Monitoring of Active Delayed Type Hypersensitivity DTH in Rats
13:26

Induction and Monitoring of Active Delayed Type Hypersensitivity DTH in Rats

Published on: July 19, 2007

18.2K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.1K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Machine Learning
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Property induction relies on sample composition, but prior research overlooked redundant tokens.
  • Real-world evidence often includes repeated entities (tokens), unlike previous experimental samples.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how adding novel types and tokens to a sample affects property generalization.
  • To understand the differential impact of types versus tokens on inductive reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments 1-3: Participants generalized novel properties from samples of birds/flowers with varying types and tokens.
  • Experiment 4: Assessed recognition and generalization from repeated tokens.
  • Modified a Bayesian model of induction to incorporate type and token effects.

Main Results:

  • Increasing sample types tightened generalization, favoring highly similar stimuli.
  • Increasing sample tokens had little effect on property generalization.
  • Repeated tokens aided recognition but were weighted less in generalization inference.

Conclusions:

  • Sample composition, specifically the ratio of types to tokens, significantly influences property generalization.
  • The study provides a refined computational model accounting for type-token dynamics in induction.