Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
Intensity harmonization techniques influence radiomics features and radiomics-based predictions in sarcoma patients
Amandine Crombé1,2,3,4, Michèle Kind5, David Fadli5
1Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonie, 33000, Bordeaux, France. a.crombe@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.
Intensity harmonization techniques (IHT) are crucial for multicentric MRI radiomics. Different IHT methods significantly impact radiomics features and predictive model performance for sarcoma patients, affecting reproducibility.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiomics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Multicentric MRI data require intensity harmonization for quantitative analysis due to non-standardized signal intensities.
- Radiomics, combining radiological phenotype quantification with machine learning, aims to improve predictive models for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of five intensity harmonization techniques (IHTs) on radiomics features and their correlation with metastatic relapse-free survival (MFS) in sarcoma patients.
- To assess the performance variation of radiomics-based models for predicting 2-year metastatic relapse based on different IHTs.
Main Methods:
- Post-processing of 70 sarcoma patients' T2-weighted MRIs using five IHTs (IHTstd, IHTfat, IHTHM.1, IHTHM.All, IHTHM.All.C) and a no-IHT dataset.
- Extraction of 45 radiomics features (RFs) for each dataset.
- Unsupervised clustering and multivariate Cox models to correlate clusters with MFS.
- Development of radiomics-based supervised models to predict 2-year metastatic relapse using a training set of 50 patients.
Main Results:
- Intensity harmonization significantly influenced all extracted radiomics features (p < 0.0001-0.02).
- Only clusters from No-IHT, IHTstd, IHTHM.All, and IHTHM.All.C datasets showed significant correlation with MFS (p = 0.004-0.02).
- Radiomics model performance for predicting 2-year metastatic relapse varied significantly across IHTs, with AUROC ranging from 0.688 (IHTstd) to 0.823 (IHTHM.1).
Conclusions:
- Intensity harmonization techniques profoundly affect radiomics feature values and the reproducibility of predictive models in sarcoma.
- The choice of IHT is critical and must be carefully detailed in radiomics post-processing pipelines to ensure reliable and reproducible analyses.
- Careful selection and reporting of intensity harmonization methods are essential for robust radiomics research and clinical application.
More Related Videos
13:41Magnetic Resonance-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Generated Hyperthermia: A Feasible Treatment Method in a Murine Rhabdomyosarcoma Model
Published on: January 13, 2023
10:17Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018