Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025
Studying Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mice
Published on: August 2, 2024
Evaluation of root resorption following orthodontic intrusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira1, Jéssica Almeida1, Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo1
1Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo.
Background/Objective:
To quantify the expected amount of orthodontically induced root resorption (OIRR) after orthodontic intrusion and assess the treatment-related factors.
Search Methods And Eligibility Criteria:
Six electronic databases and partial grey literature were searched without limitations regarding language or publication year until April 2020. Randomized clinical trials and non-randomized prospective and retrospective studies evaluating root resorption after orthodontic intrusion were included.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Risk of bias (RoB) assessment was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration's RoB Tool 2.0 and ROBINS-I tool for the randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively. The data were combined into two random-effects meta-analyses estimating OIRR following orthodontic intrusion. One evaluated OIRR in the anterior region, while the other assessed OIRR in the posterior region. Sub-group analyses regarding the type of mechanics applied, duration of intrusion, amount of force, and sensitivity analysis of the study design and imaging examinations were also performed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed through the Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Results:
The qualitative analysis included 14 studies; however, the meta-analysis was performed with 7 records. The random-effects model assumes that 0.72 mm [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16 to 1.28] and 0.41 mm (95% CI: -0.24 to 1.07) of OIRR should be expected in the incisors and the molars, respectively. Sub-group analyses showed that the assessed treatment-related factors presented minimum impact in OIRR after orthodontic intrusion. The GRADE resulted in moderate and low certainty regarding the meta-analysis.
Limitations:
The major limitation of the present meta-analysis is that OIRR can be affected by several factors, some of which are assessed in this review.
Conclusions:
Orthodontic intrusion, evaluated as an isolated mechanic, caused less than 1 mm of OIRR, which is within the acceptable limits for clinical implication. Treatment-related factors did not show a significant influence on OIRR.
Registration:
This review was registered in PROSPERO, protocol number CRD42018098495.
