Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Development and Validation of Chromium Getters for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power Systems
Published on: May 26, 2019
Mitigation of chromium (VI) toxicity by additional sulfur in some vegetable crops involves glutathione and hydrogen
Bishwajit Kumar Kushwaha1, Vijay Pratap Singh1
1Plant Physiology Laboratory, Department of Botany, C.M.P. Degree College, A Constituent Post Graduate College of University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, 211002, India.
Abstract:
Toxic metals cause substantial reduction in crop yields every year. Therefore, worldwide scientific efforts are being made to reduce such losses in crop productivity by using certain chemical protectants such as nutrients like sulfur (S), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), glutathione (GSH), etc. Therefore in this study, we have tested potential of additional S, along with probable involvement of H2S and GSH in mitigating hexavalent chromium (CrVI) toxicity in tomato, pea and brinjal seedlings. Chromium (VI) decreased shoot and root length, endogenous H2S, and cell viability due to greater Cr accumulation that led to cell death in roots. Chromium (VI) enhanced oxidative stress markers i.e. superoxide radical, hydrogen peroxide, lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation due to down-regulation in ascorbate-glutathione cycle. However, additional S reversed toxic effect of Cr(VI). Chromium (VI) slightly stimulated enzymes of glutathione biosynthesis. Besides this, the results also showed that addition of buthionine sulphoximine (BSO, synthetic inhibitor of glutathione biosynthesis) interestingly further enhanced Cr(VI) toxicity even in the presence of additional S. But this effect of BSO was reversed by the addition of GSH. Interestingly, hydroxylamine (HA, synthetic inhibitor of cysteine desulfhydrase) had also further increased Cr(VI) toxicity even in the presence of additional S but sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS, an H2S donor) reversed this effect. Furthermore, ameliorative behaviour of NaHS against Cr(VI) toxicity was reversed by the hypotaurine (HT, a H2S scavenger). All together results suggested that additional S involved GSH and H2S in mitigating Cr(VI) toxicity in studied vegetables, in which GSH acted downstream of H2S signal.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sulfur Assimilation
Preparation and Reactions of Thiols
Phase II Reactions: Glutathione Conjugation and Mercapturic Acid Formation
Several distinctive characteristics distinguish glutathione conjugation from other phase II...
Preparation and Reactions of Sulfides
Bioremediation
Phase II Reactions: Miscellaneous Conjugation Reactions
A key example involves the conjugation of cyanide ions, which impair cellular respiration and alter hemoglobin into non-oxygen-carrying cyanmethemoglobin. To neutralize this threat, a sulfur atom from thiosulphate is transferred to the cyanide ion, catalyzed by the enzyme rhodanese, resulting in an inactive compound called thiocyanate. The production of...

