Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 6, 2025

05:34
A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats
Published on: May 20, 2019
8.2K
Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of Intrafraction Prostate Displacements for Two Immobilization Systems
Farshad Mostafaei1, Shona T Dougherty2, Russell J Hamilton3
1Radiation Oncology, Augusta University Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA.
Cureus
|October 9, 2020
Summary
Different immobilization systems significantly impact prostate displacement during hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). System B demonstrated reduced intrafraction prostate motion, suggesting optimized clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Prostate Cancer Treatment
Background:
- Accurate clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins are crucial for hypofractionated prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
- Immobilization systems and setup errors can affect these margins through prostate displacement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare intrafraction prostate displacement between two different immobilization systems (A and B).
- To determine the impact of immobilization systems on CTV-PTV margins for prostate SBRT.
Main Methods:
- A preliminary study involving six patients with localized prostate cancer and implanted marker seeds.
- Planar X-ray imaging pre- and post-treatment to measure intrafraction prostate displacement.
- Calculation of average absolute and 3D displacements for each system and subsequent CTV-PTV margin computation.
Main Results:
- System A showed average 3D displacement of 2.6 ± 0.2 mm, resulting in margins of 2.5 mm (lateral), 2.5 mm (longitudinal), and 3.6 mm (vertical).
- System B exhibited lower average 3D displacement of 1.3 ± 0.2 mm, with computed margins of 1.4 mm (lateral), 1.6 mm (longitudinal), and 2.4 mm (vertical).
- Both systems yielded margins comparable to those typically used in hypofractionated prostate SBRT.
Conclusions:
- Immobilization system choice significantly influences intrafraction prostate displacement.
- System B offers potentially tighter margins due to reduced intrafraction motion compared to System A.
- The findings support the importance of selecting appropriate immobilization for precise prostate SBRT delivery.

