Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

10:14
3D Scanning Technology Bridging Microcircuits and Macroscale Brain Images in 3D Novel Embedding Overlapping Protocol
Published on: May 12, 2019
7.5K
Repeatability and reproducibility of human brain morphometry using three-dimensional magnetic resonance
Shohei Fujita1,2, Guido Buonincontri3,4, Matteo Cencini3,4
1Department of Radiology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Human Brain Mapping
|October 22, 2020
Summary
Three-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (3D MRF) offers repeatable and reproducible whole-brain analysis of cortical thickness and subcortical volumes. This advanced technique shows consistency with conventional T1-weighted imaging, with slight biases noted.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Quantitative MRI
- Brain Anatomy
Background:
- Conventional T1-weighted imaging is standard for brain analysis.
- Three-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (3D MRF) allows volumetric quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation values.
- 3D MRF has the potential to replace conventional structural imaging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of 3D MRF for brain cortical thickness and subcortical volumetric analysis.
- To compare 3D MRF measurements with conventional 3D T1-weighted images in healthy volunteers.
- To establish 3D MRF as a reliable tool for neuroimaging analysis.
Main Methods:
- Scan-rescan tests were performed for both 3D MRF and conventional 3D fast spoiled gradient recalled echo (FSPGR).
- Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes were measured using automatic brain segmentation software.
- Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Main Results:
- Cortical thickness measurements showed similar wCV and ICC for both 3D MRF and FSPGR.
- The percent relative difference in cortical thickness between 3D MRF and FSPGR was 8.0% ± 3.2%.
- Subcortical volume measurements demonstrated similar wCV and ICC between 3D MRF and FSPGR, with a 7.1% ± 3.6% relative difference.
Conclusions:
- 3D MRF provides highly repeatable and reproducible measurements of human brain cortical thickness and subcortical volumes.
- 3D MRF results are consistent with conventional 3D T1-weighted imaging, though a slight bias exists.
- Careful consideration is needed when combining data from 3D MRF and conventional acquisitions due to observed biases.

