Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 28, 2025

Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Study of a Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Published on: March 3, 2023
Characteristics and Outcome for Persons with Diabetic Foot Ulcer and No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia
Marco Meloni1, Valentina Izzo1, Valerio Da Ros2
1Department of Systems Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Insights
Diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and foot ulcers who failed revascularization (NO-CLI) had significantly worse outcomes, including higher amputation and mortality rates, compared to successfully treated patients (ST-CLI). This highlights the severe impact of PAD in this population.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Diabetology
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Diabetic foot ulcers and critical limb ischemia (CLI) represent a significant clinical challenge.
- Lower-limb revascularization is a key component of limb salvage protocols for these patients.
- Patient outcomes can vary significantly based on the success of revascularization procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate clinical and vascular characteristics of diabetic patients with foot ulcers and CLI.
- To compare outcomes (limb salvage, amputation, mortality) between successfully treated (ST-CLI) and no-option (NO-CLI) CLI patients.
- To identify factors associated with poorer outcomes in the NO-CLI group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 239 diabetic patients admitted with foot ulcers and CLI.
- Patients managed with a limb salvage protocol including lower-limb revascularization.
- Division into ST-CLI (successful revascularization) and NO-CLI (failed revascularization) groups for outcome comparison at 1-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- NO-CLI patients (25.1%) exhibited higher rates of ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than ST-CLI patients.
- The NO-CLI group presented with more extensive peripheral arterial disease (PAD), including more affected vessels and distal lesions.
- 1-year outcomes showed significantly lower limb salvage (13.8% vs. 73.4%), higher amputation (30% vs. 4.5%), and mortality (50% vs. 8.9%) in NO-CLI compared to ST-CLI patients.
Conclusions:
- Diabetic patients with no-option CLI and foot ulcers demonstrate a more severe PAD pattern.
- Failed revascularization in this population is strongly associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes.
- These findings underscore the critical need for effective revascularization strategies and comprehensive management in diabetic CLI patients.
Abstract:
The study aimed to evaluate clinical and vascular characteristics, as well as outcomes, for diabetic persons with foot ulceration and no-option critical limb ischemia (CLI). The study group included a sample of patients admitted to our diabetic foot unit because of a new diabetic foot ulcer and CLI. All subjects were managed using a limb salvage protocol which includes lower-limb revascularization. According to whether or not the revascularization procedure was a success, patients were respectively divided into two groups: successfully treated CLI patients (ST-CLI) and no-option CLI patients (NO-CLI). Failed revascularization was considered in the case of technical recanalization failure of occluded vessels (inability to overcome the obstruction) and/or absence of arterial flow to the foot. Limb salvage, major amputation, and death after 1 year of follow-up were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Overall, 239 patients were included, 74.9% belonging to ST-CLI and 25.1% to NO-CLI. NO-CLI patients reported more cases of ischemic heart disease (80 vs. 62.1, p = 0.008), heart failure (63.3 vs. 32.4%, p < 0.0001), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (60 vs. 25.7%) than ST-CLI patients. In addition, more vessels were affected in the NO-CLI group (5.2 ± 1.6 vs. 4 ± 1.5, p < 0.0001), and there was more involvement of tibio-peroneal trunk (50 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.006), anterior tibial (93.3 vs. 82.7, p = 0.03), posterior tibial (93.3 vs. 73.7%, p = 0.0005), peroneal (70 vs. 48%, p = 0.002), and below-the-ankle arteries (73.3 vs. 39.1%, p < 0.0001) than ST-CLI. The 1 year outcomes for the whole population were 69.9% limb salvage, 10.9% major amputation, and 19.2% death. The outcomes for NO-CLI and ST-CLI were, respectively, as follows: limb salvage (13.8 vs. 73.4%, p < 0.0001), amputation (30 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.0001), and mortality (50 vs. 8.9%, p < 0.0001). NO-CLI patients showed a more severe pattern of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with distal arterial lesions and worse outcomes than ST-CLI.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

