Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples
Published on: June 19, 2018
Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards interlaboratory study on intensity calibration for x-ray
Benjamen P Reed1, David J H Cant1, Steve J Spencer1
1National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.
This study introduces low-density polyethylene (LDPE) for calibrating x-ray photoelectron spectrometers, offering an alternative to traditional metals. The developed LDPE method shows promising accuracy for intensity scale calibration in X-ray photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS).
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Surface Science
- Metrology
Background:
- Traditional intensity scale calibration for X-ray photoelectron spectrometers (XPS) relies on gold, silver, and copper, which have limitations.
- An interlaboratory study was conducted under the Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards to explore alternative calibration materials.
- Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) was investigated as a potential alternative reference material for XPS intensity calibration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) for intensity scale calibration of X-ray photoelectron spectrometers (XPS).
- To develop and refine an LDPE-based calibration protocol.
- To assess the feasibility of establishing a standardized XPS intensity calibration method using LDPE.
Main Methods:
- Development of improved LDPE reference spectra using data from an interlaboratory study, corrected for instrument geometry with a quartz-monochromated Al Kα x-ray source.
- Calculation of transmission functions for participant datasets using the new LDPE reference spectra.
- Comparison of LDPE calibration results against traditional gold calibration methods (NPL reference spectra).
Main Results:
- The LDPE intensity calibration method achieved an average absolute offset of ~3.0% and a systematic deviation of ±6.5% across participants.
- Higher pass energies (≥90 eV) yielded better results (~5.8% offset, ±5.7% deviation) compared to lower pass energies (<90 eV) (~4.9% offset, ±8.8% deviation).
- Surface roughness of LDPE and issues like low count rates at lower pass energies impacted calibration accuracy.
Conclusions:
- LDPE is a viable alternative material for XPS intensity scale calibration, offering comparable accuracy to traditional methods.
- An updated LDPE intensity calibration protocol was developed to address identified issues and improve usability.
- There is a need for a consistent, traceable intensity calibration standard in the XPS community, with LDPE proposed as a pathway towards an international standard.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
There are three main types of inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) instruments: sequential, simultaneous multichannel, and Fourier transform instruments, with the latter being less commonly used....
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing...

