Technical Note: A simple method for measuring the slice sensitivity profile of iteratively reconstructed CT images using a non-slanted edge plane
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2026

3D Imaging of Soft-Tissue Samples using an X-ray Specific Staining Method and Nanoscopic Computed Tomography
Published on: October 24, 2019
Akihiro Narita1, Masaki Ohkubo1, Takahiro Fukaya1,2
1Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, 2-746 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku Niigata, 951-8518, Japan.
Purpose:
A method for measuring the slice sensitivity profile (SSP) of computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms was reported by the AAPM Task Group 233 (TG233). In this method, the phantom plane edge is slightly slanted with respect to the scan plane to obtain a composite oversampled edge-spread function (ESF). However, it is expected that a fine-sampled ESF can be obtained directly from images reconstructed with a small slice increment without slanting the edge plane. This study aimed to investigate the validity of using a non-slanted edge plane.
Methods:
In the proposed non-slanted edge method, the phantom was positioned so that the plane edge was perpendicular to the longitudinal z-axis, and images were reconstructed with a 1-mm slice thickness and 0.1-mm increment. The mean CT value was obtained in each slice and plotted as a function of slice position along the z-axis, thereby generating the ESF. The SSP was calculated from the ESF by differentiation. In the TG 233-recommended slanted edge method, the SSP was obtained by following the procedure described in the TG233 report. To validate the methodology, we first used filtered back projection (FBP) images to compare SSPs obtained using the non-slanted edge method, slanted edge method, and a standard method using a high-contrast thin object (coin). Next, for two types of IR algorithms, we compared the SSPs obtained using the non-slanted and slanted edge methods.
Results:
For the FBP images, the SSP measured using the non-slanted edge method agreed well with SSPs measured using the coin and slanted edge methods. For the IR images, the SSPs measured using the non-slanted and slanted edge methods showed good agreement.
Conclusions:
The non-slanted edge method was demonstrated to be valid. The simplicity and practicality of the method allows routine and accurate determination of the SSP.
More Related Videos
09:00Visualization of Failure and the Associated Grain-Scale Mechanical Behavior of Granular Soils under Shear using Synchrotron X-Ray Micro-Tomography
Published on: September 29, 2019
08:39Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
Published on: June 24, 2025