Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Positive Regulator Molecules02:39

Positive Regulator Molecules

6.2K
Mitotic cell division results in daughter cells that exactly resemble the parent cell. However, errors in the DNA replication or distribution of genetic material may lead to genetic mutations that may be passed down to every new cell formed from the resulting abnormal cell. Propagation of such mutant cells is restricted through checkpoint mechanisms present at different stages of the cell cycle. These checkpoints involve regulator molecules that either promote or demote cell cycle events.
6.2K
Positive Regulator Molecules01:45

Positive Regulator Molecules

121.7K
To consistently produce healthy cells, the cell cycle—the process that generates daughter cells—must be precisely regulated.
121.7K
Inhibition of Cdk Activity02:34

Inhibition of Cdk Activity

5.3K
The orderly progression of the cell cycle depends on the activation of Cdk protein by binding to its cyclin partner. However, the cell cycle must be restricted when undergoing abnormal changes. Most cancers correlate to the deregulated cell cycle, and since Cdks are a central component of the cell cycle, Cdk inhibitors are extensively studied to develop anticancer agents. For instance, cyclin D associates with several Cdks, such as Cdk 4/6, to form an active complex. The cyclin D-Cdk4/6 complex...
5.3K
Anaphase Promoting Complex00:50

Anaphase Promoting Complex

3.1K
The stepwise destruction of specific proteins is necessary for the progression and completion of the cell cycle. Such proteins are ubiquitinated by ubiquitin ligases and then subsequently destroyed by the proteasome. The SCF (Skp1/Cullin/F-box) and the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) are two important ubiquitin ligases involved in cell cycle progression. While SCF is active throughout the cell cycle, APC gets activated during metaphase to anaphase transition. Cdc20 or Cdh1 binds to APC and...
3.1K
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis02:15

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis

6.0K
Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
6.0K
Separation of Sister Chromatids02:17

Separation of Sister Chromatids

4.0K
At the transition from prophase to metaphase, there is a reduction in cohesion along the chromosomal arms, resulting in the resolution of sister chromatids. However, residual cohesin connections remain to hold the sister chromatids together until the transition from metaphase to anaphase. The residual connection prevents any premature separation of sister chromatids, blocking the risks of aneuploidy within the daughter cells.
At the onset of anaphase, separase, a proteolytic enzyme, is...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial biology of crowded tumor cells: A new map for designing drug combinations.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same author

OMAMA-DB: the Oregon-Massachusetts Mammography Database.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same author

ERK autoinhibition mechanism informs a drug combination strategy.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2026
Same author

How Functional Variants Reconfigure the Rac2 Conformational Landscape.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Energy landscapes in molecular biology: History, principles, and perspectives.

Quarterly reviews of biophysics·2026
Same author

Repurposing AI for protein interactions and dynamics: opportunities, limitations, and lessons.

Frontiers in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Anisotropic unbinding and location-dependent hovering of a kinesin motor head over microtubule.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Kinesin-5/Cut7 C-terminal tail phosphorylation influence on motor regulation through multi-scale molecular modeling.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Dynamic conformations of fluorophores on self-labeling protein tags.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Different actions of RyR2 open and closed channel block explained by a multiscale Ca<sup>2+</sup> release model.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Membrane Environment Sets the Functional pK<sub>a</sub> of Ionizable Lipids.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Distinguishable spreading dynamics in microbial communities.

Biophysical journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Identification of Cyclin-dependent Kinase 1 Specific Phosphorylation Sites by an In Vitro Kinase Assay
12:26

Identification of Cyclin-dependent Kinase 1 Specific Phosphorylation Sites by an In Vitro Kinase Assay

Published on: May 3, 2018

19.1K

Active and Inactive Cdc42 Differ in Their Insert Region Conformational Dynamics.

Nurit Haspel1, Hyunbum Jang2, Ruth Nussinov3

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.

Biophysical Journal
|December 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cell division control protein 42 homolog (Cdc42) protein dynamics differ between inactive (GDP-bound) and active (GTP-bound) states. These conformational changes, especially in the insert region, impact effector binding and cancer progression, offering insights into Cdc42 regulation.

More Related Videos

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

9.0K
Aip1p Dynamics Are Altered by the R256H Mutation in Actin
08:57

Aip1p Dynamics Are Altered by the R256H Mutation in Actin

Published on: July 30, 2014

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 24, 2025

Identification of Cyclin-dependent Kinase 1 Specific Phosphorylation Sites by an In Vitro Kinase Assay
12:26

Identification of Cyclin-dependent Kinase 1 Specific Phosphorylation Sites by an In Vitro Kinase Assay

Published on: May 3, 2018

19.1K
Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

9.0K
Aip1p Dynamics Are Altered by the R256H Mutation in Actin
08:57

Aip1p Dynamics Are Altered by the R256H Mutation in Actin

Published on: July 30, 2014

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Cell division control protein 42 homolog (Cdc42) is a Ras superfamily GTPase crucial for cellular functions and cancer progression.
  • Understanding the structural dynamics of Cdc42 in its active and inactive states is vital for deciphering its regulatory mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the structure and dynamics of GDP-bound (inactive) and GTP-bound (active) Cdc42 catalytic domains using molecular dynamics simulations.
  • To identify conformational differences between active and inactive Cdc42 and their implications for effector binding and activation.

Main Methods:

  • All-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.
  • Essential dynamic analysis.
  • Simulation of oncogenic mutations (G12V, Q61L) in Cdc42.

Main Results:

  • Significant dynamic differences were observed between GDP-bound and GTP-bound Cdc42, particularly in the insert region (residues 122-135).
  • The insert region exhibits greater flexibility in the GDP-bound state, while switch regions show conformational changes in both states.
  • Mutations G12V and Q61L affect Cdc42's GTPase activity and conformational dynamics, similar to K-Ras mutations.

Conclusions:

  • Conformational dynamics, especially in the insert and switch regions, are key to Cdc42 nucleotide binding and activation.
  • Disruption of hydrogen bonds in GDP-bound Cdc42 contributes to its distinct dynamics compared to other Rho GTPases.
  • The inactive Cdc42 conformation may have a reduced capacity for effector binding, influencing cellular processes and cancer.