Genomic Landscape and Targeted Treatment of Gallbladder Cancer: Results of a First Ongoing Prospective Study
Amol Patel1, Dharmesh Soneji1, Harinder Pal Singh1
1Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India.
Abstract:
Background Prognosis of gallbladder cancer (GBC) has not changed in the past 20 years. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) carries potential to determine the actionability for multiple targets, including ERBB2 , ERBB3 , MET , ROSI , FGFR , and PIK3 . This study evaluates the role of CGP and targeted therapies. Methods This is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study. All consecutive patients of unresectable and/or metastatic GBC of age ≥18 years were enrolled. Hybrid capture-based CGP was performed by Foundation Medicine CDx. All patients received first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen. Patients with ERBB2/3 amplification received trastuzumab with capecitabine or nab-paclitaxel, and patients with MET amplification were treated with crizotinib. For ERBB2/3 mutations, lapatinib plus capecitabine regimen was used. Results Fifty patients were studied with a median age of 56 years (range 26-83) and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.6. ERBB2 and ERBB3 amplification was seen in 9 (18%) and 2 (4%) patients, respectively. Four patients with ERBB2 amplification received trastuzumab and/or lapatinib, showed partial response, and maintained response beyond 12 weeks. One patient had mixed response, whereas two patients progressed on trastuzumab and lapatinib. Three patients with ERBB3 mutations showed response to lapatinib-capecitabine. One patient with MET amplification responded to crizotinib for 4 weeks. PIK3 mutations were present in 14% of cases and were independent of ERBB aberrations. Conclusion GBC is enriched in 28% of patients with ERBB2 and ERBB3 amplifications and/or mutations. Responses are seen with lapatinib in concurrent ERBB2 mutation and amplification. ERBB3 mutation showed response to lapatinib. MET and PIK3 are new findings in GBC, which may be targeted.
Insights
Comprehensive genomic profiling identifies actionable targets like ERBB2, ERBB3, and MET in gallbladder cancer (GBC). Targeted therapies showed promising responses in patients with specific genetic alterations, offering new treatment avenues.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- Gallbladder cancer (GBC) prognosis has remained stagnant for two decades.
- Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can identify actionable targets for GBC treatment.
- Key targets include ERBB2, ERBB3, MET, ROSI, FGFR, and PIK3.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of CGP in identifying actionable genomic alterations in GBC.
- To assess the efficacy of targeted therapies in patients with GBC harboring specific mutations or amplifications.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, prospective, single-arm study enrolled 50 patients with unresectable/metastatic GBC.
- Hybrid capture-based CGP was performed.
- Patients received first-line gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy; targeted therapies were administered based on genomic findings (e.g., trastuzumab, lapatinib for ERBB2/3 alterations; crizotinib for MET amplification).
Main Results:
- ERBB2 and ERBB3 amplification occurred in 18% and 4% of patients, respectively.
- Four patients with ERBB2 amplification showed partial responses to trastuzumab and/or lapatinib.
- ERBB3 mutations responded to lapatinib-capecitabine; one patient with MET amplification responded to crizotinib.
Conclusions:
- GBC is frequently enriched with ERBB2 and ERBB3 amplifications/mutations (28% of patients).
- Targeted therapies, particularly lapatinib, demonstrate efficacy in GBC with concurrent ERBB2 alterations and ERBB3 mutations.
- MET and PIK3 alterations represent novel findings in GBC, suggesting new therapeutic targets.
More Related Videos
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
