Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 22, 2025

Delivery of Cardioactive Therapeutics in a Porcine Myocardial Infarction Model
Published on: February 10, 2023
In Whose Interest? Recent Developments in Regulatory Immediate Action against Medical Practitioners in Australia
Owen M Bradfield1, Matthew J Spittal2, Marie M Bismark3
1PhD Candidate, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne.
Abstract:
"Immediate action" is a powerful regulatory tool available to Medical Boards. It protects the public from harm by restricting a medical practitioner's registration after allegations have been made, but before wrongdoing is proven. This article charts the development of these coercive powers in Australia and examines the legal, socio-political and ethical justification for supplementing a well-defined "public risk" test with a broad and controversial "public interest" test that leaves medical practitioners vulnerable to inconsistent decision-making. Compared to overseas jurisdictions, immediate action powers in Australia offer fewer procedural protections. The regulatory response to perceived threats to public trust and confidence in the medical profession needs to be proportionate, transparent, effective, and consistent, to protect the public while also being fair to practitioners.

