Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

A Simple Bioassay for the Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
Published on: March 15, 2016
In Whose Interest? Recent Developments in Regulatory Immediate Action against Medical Practitioners in Australia
Owen M Bradfield1, Matthew J Spittal2, Marie M Bismark3
1PhD Candidate, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne.
Abstract:
"Immediate action" is a powerful regulatory tool available to Medical Boards. It protects the public from harm by restricting a medical practitioner's registration after allegations have been made, but before wrongdoing is proven. This article charts the development of these coercive powers in Australia and examines the legal, socio-political and ethical justification for supplementing a well-defined "public risk" test with a broad and controversial "public interest" test that leaves medical practitioners vulnerable to inconsistent decision-making. Compared to overseas jurisdictions, immediate action powers in Australia offer fewer procedural protections. The regulatory response to perceived threats to public trust and confidence in the medical profession needs to be proportionate, transparent, effective, and consistent, to protect the public while also being fair to practitioners.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care I
Standards of Care II
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Torts II
Drug Regulation
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact

