Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview of Transposition and Recombination02:13

Overview of Transposition and Recombination

18.0K
Transposons make up a significant part of genomes of various organisms. Therefore, it is believed that transposition played a major evolutionary role in speciation by changing genome sizes and modifying gene expression patterns. For example, in bacteria, transposition can lead to conferring antibiotic resistance. Movement of transposable elements within the genetic pool of pathogenic bacteria can aid in transfer of antibiotic-resistant genetic elements. In eukaryotes, transposons can carry out...
18.0K
DNA-only Transposons02:57

DNA-only Transposons

15.8K
DNA-only transposons are called autonomous transposons since they code for the enzyme transposase that is required for the transposition mechanism. Insertion of transposons can alter gene functions in multiple ways. They can mutate the gene, alter gene expression by introducing a novel promoter or insulator sequence, introduce new splice sites, and change the mRNA transcripts produced, or remodel chromatin structure.
The donor site from where the transposon is excised is either degraded or...
15.8K
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

11.2K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
11.2K
LTR Retrotransposons03:08

LTR Retrotransposons

18.8K
LTR retrotransposons are class I transposable elements with long terminal repeats flanking an internal coding region. These elements are less abundant in mammals compared to other class I transposable elements. About 8 percent of human genomic DNA comprises LTR retrotransposons. Some of the common examples of LTR retrotransposons are Ty elements in yeast and Copia elements in Drosophila.
The internal coding region of LTR retrotransposons and their mechanism of transposition closely resembles a...
18.8K
Non-LTR Retrotransposons03:18

Non-LTR Retrotransposons

12.6K
As the name suggests, non-LTR retrotransposons lack the long terminal repeats characteristic of the LTR retrotransposons. Additionally, both LTR and non-LTR retrotransposons use distinct mechanisms of mobilization. Non-LTR retrotransposons are further divided into two classes - Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), both of which occur abundantly in most mammals, including humans. Some of the active non-LTR retrotransposons in humans are L1...
12.6K
Transposons01:24

Transposons

644
Transposons, or "jumping genes," are small mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that range from 700 to 40,000 base pairs in length. They are found in all organisms and can move within the same chromosome or transfer to different chromosomes. In some cases, transposons can also jump between different host DNA molecules, such as plasmids or viruses, contributing to genetic variability.Barbara McClintock first discovered these mobile genetic elements in the 1940s while studying maize genetics, and she...
644

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alternatively Spliced Dual-Coding Regions Contribute to the Human Gene Regulatory Program.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Simulation-Based Spatially Explicit Close-Kin Mark-Recapture.

Molecular ecology resources·2025
Same author

DIPLOMAT: multi-animal tracking with efficient manual editing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Simpatico: accurate and ultra-fast virtual drug screening with atomic embeddings.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

NEAR: neural embeddings for amino acid relationships.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Simulation-based spatially explicit close-kin mark-recapture.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Unifying Repbase and Dfam: a new open foundation for transposable element research.

Mobile DNA·2026
Same journal

Dynamic transposable element expression during Hydra head regeneration.

Mobile DNA·2026
Same journal

Glomhopper-a subfamily of DUF3504-encoding CryptonA elements in Glomeromycota.

Mobile DNA·2026
Same journal

Stones in genomic storms: transposable element-driven variation in Prunus fruit trees.

Mobile DNA·2026
Same journal

Transposable elements in hematopoietic stem cells upon aging and myeloid malignancies.

Mobile DNA·2026
Same journal

Howler monkey Platy-1 and Alu SINEs: a resource for Alouatta genomics.

Mobile DNA·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Real-Time Quantification of the Effects of IS200/IS605 Family-Associated TnpB on Transposon Activity
04:04

Real-Time Quantification of the Effects of IS200/IS605 Family-Associated TnpB on Transposon Activity

Published on: January 20, 2023

2.6K

Transposable element subfamily annotation has a reproducibility problem.

Kaitlin M Carey1, Gilia Patterson1,2, Travis J Wheeler3

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT, USA.

Mobile DNA
|January 24, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Transposable element (TE) subfamily annotation is unreliable, with over 10% of homologous sequences misclassified. This highlights the need for improved TE subfamily definitions and annotation methods for accurate genomic analysis.

Keywords:
Interspersed repeatsSegmental duplicationsSubfamiliesTransposable elements

More Related Videos

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.8K
Robust DNA Isolation and High-throughput Sequencing Library Construction for Herbarium Specimens
13:03

Robust DNA Isolation and High-throughput Sequencing Library Construction for Herbarium Specimens

Published on: March 8, 2018

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Real-Time Quantification of the Effects of IS200/IS605 Family-Associated TnpB on Transposon Activity
04:04

Real-Time Quantification of the Effects of IS200/IS605 Family-Associated TnpB on Transposon Activity

Published on: January 20, 2023

2.6K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.8K
Robust DNA Isolation and High-throughput Sequencing Library Construction for Herbarium Specimens
13:03

Robust DNA Isolation and High-throughput Sequencing Library Construction for Herbarium Specimens

Published on: March 8, 2018

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Transposable elements (TEs) are classified into families and subfamilies based on replication history and fine-grained features.
  • Subfamily classification aims to capture the evolutionary history of TE families.
  • Evaluating TE subfamily annotation reliability is crucial for understanding genome evolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the reproducibility of transposable element subfamily annotation.
  • To evaluate annotation reliability using homologous sequences in humans and chimpanzees, and replicate copies from segmental duplications.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative genomics analysis of human and chimpanzee genomes.
  • Assessment of TE subfamily annotation in segmental duplication replicates.
  • Identification of factors contributing to annotation discordance, such as point mutations and homologous recombination.

Main Results:

  • Standard TE subfamily annotation methods show over 10% discordance in homologous and replicate sequences.
  • Point mutations and homologous recombination contribute to annotation errors, particularly in young TE families like Alu.
  • Annotation unreliability is not fully explained by known mutation and recombination processes.

Conclusions:

  • High disagreement in TE subfamily annotation necessitates further research into subfamily definitions.
  • Development of methods to represent confidence in TE instance annotation is needed.
  • Improved approaches for utilizing nuanced TE annotation data in downstream analyses are required.