Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Degree-of-Freedom System01:24

One-Degree-of-Freedom System

644
In mechanical engineering, one-degree-of-freedom systems form the basis of a wide range of electrical and mechanical components. Using these models, engineers can predict the behavior of various parts in a larger system, which gives them insight into how different forces interact with each other.
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
644
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

5.1K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
5.1K
Neural Control of Respiration01:18

Neural Control of Respiration

3.8K
The neural regulation of respiration is a meticulously coordinated process primarily controlled by the respiratory centers located within the brainstem. These centers, composed of specialized neurons, transmit nerve impulses that control the contraction and relaxation of our respiratory muscles.
Respiratory Centers in the Brainstem
Two primary areas comprise the respiratory center: the medullary respiratory center in the medulla oblongata and the pontine respiratory group in the pons. The...
3.8K
Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

1.3K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
1.3K
PD Controller: Design01:26

PD Controller: Design

458
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
458

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

If Turing Played Piano With an Artificial Partner.

Artificial life·2026
Same journal

Discovering Partial Differential Equations With Neural Cellular Automata.

Artificial life·2026
Same journal

Book Review: Exploring the Boundaries of Life-as-It-Is.

Artificial life·2026
Same journal

System 0/1/2/3: Quad-Process Theory for Multitimescale Embodied Collective Cognitive Systems.

Artificial life·2025
Same journal

To Engineer an Angel, First Validate the Devil: Analyzing the "Could Be" in Artificial Life's "Life as-It-Could-Be".

Artificial life·2025
Same journal

Untapped Potential in Self-Optimization of Hopfield Networks: The Creativity of Unsupervised Learning.

Artificial life·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.6K

Evolutionary Robotics Controllers with Proprioception Facilitated by Neural-Network-Based Simulators.

Antin Phillips1, Mathys C du Plessis2

  • 1Nelson Mandela University, Department of Computing Sciences. antin.phillips@mandela.ac.za.

Artificial Life
|January 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study enhanced robotic controllers with internal simulators for better position awareness. Periodic simulator correction is crucial to maintain controller performance over time.

Keywords:
Evolutionary roboticsneural networkspath integrationproprioceptionsimulator neural networks

More Related Videos

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots
10:34

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Published on: May 25, 2013

15.4K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 20, 2025

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.6K
Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots
10:34

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Published on: May 25, 2013

15.4K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Control Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Robotic controllers traditionally lack inherent position sense.
  • Human navigation provides inspiration for artificial systems.
  • Simulating action effects is key for robotic self-awareness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate a novel method for endowing robotic controllers with a sense of position.
  • To compare the performance of controllers with and without internal simulators.
  • To assess the impact of simulator accuracy on controller performance.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporation of internal robotic simulators into controller architecture.
  • Comparative testing of controllers with and without internal simulators.
  • Analysis of controller performance over time and with simulator usage.

Main Results:

  • Controllers equipped with internal simulators demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional controllers.
  • The accuracy of the internal simulator degraded with extended execution time.
  • Performance enhancement was contingent on periodic correction of the internal simulator.

Conclusions:

  • Internal simulators offer a viable method for improving robotic controller position sense.
  • Sustained performance requires managing and correcting simulator drift.
  • Future work should focus on robust simulator correction mechanisms for long-term autonomous operation.