Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.4K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.4K
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.3K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.3K
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

821
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
821
Perception01:28

Perception

808
Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
808
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

441
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
441
Introducing Social Perception01:29

Introducing Social Perception

163
Perceiving others accurately is fundamental to effective communication and relationship-building. Social perception, a key concept in social psychology, refers to the cognitive processes through which individuals gather and interpret information about others to understand their actions, intentions, and motivations. This process extends beyond spoken words and overt behaviors, incorporating subtle nonverbal cues and contextual factors.Nonverbal Cues and Their SignificanceNonverbal cues play a...
163

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Theta band activity during event-file retrieval is influenced by stimulus salience in the preceding action episode.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Binding and retrieval of omitted responses in complex response sequences.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

From prediction to control: Age-related dissociations between implicit regularity encoding and attentional modulation during perception-action integration.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

A Multiplexed Neural Code Governs Dynamic Perception-Action Reconfiguration during Response Inhibition.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

The sound of silence: Binding and retrieval of silence in distractor-response binding.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.6K

Different effects of spatial separation in action and perception.

Sarah Schäfer1, Christian Frings2

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, D-54286, Trier, Germany. schaefers@uni-trier.de.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|January 27, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial distance impacts stimulus processing but not response processing in cognitive tasks. This finding suggests limitations to the common coding theory, which posits shared mechanisms for perception and action.

Keywords:
Action and perceptionCognitive categorizationCommon codingSpatial distance

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.1K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.6K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.1K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Spatial distance of response keys can improve nonspatial task performance.
  • Spatial distance of stimulus features can enhance performance in spatial tasks.
  • The common coding theory suggests shared processing for perception and action.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the commonality of stimulus distance and response distance effects.
  • To determine if spatial distance influences both stimulus and response processing similarly.
  • To test the boundaries of the common coding theory.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a standard Eriksen flanker task.
  • Varied spatial distance between stimuli and between responses identically.
  • Compared the impact of spatial distance on stimulus vs. response processing.

Main Results:

  • Spatial distance significantly affected stimulus feature processing.
  • Spatial distance had no discernible effect on response feature processing.
  • The influence of spatial distance differed between stimulus and response processing.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial distance primarily impacts perceptual processing, not motor response execution.
  • The data suggest a boundary for the common coding theory of perception and action.
  • Findings indicate distinct processing pathways for stimulus and response spatial information.