Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

4.0K
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
4.0K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

835
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
835
Structuralism01:26

Structuralism

2.8K
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
2.8K
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

475
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
475
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

625
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
625
Gestalt Psychology01:14

Gestalt Psychology

1.2K
Gestalt psychology, founded by Max Wertheimer, Kurt Koffka, and Wolfgang Kohler, emphasizes the importance of understanding perception as an organized whole. Developed as a counter to Wilhelm Wundt's structuralism, this approach posits that our perceptions are more than just the sum of sensory parts; they are comprehensive wholes where the relationships between parts define the perception. The principle "The whole is greater than the sum of its parts" encapsulates this view,...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The James-Lange theory of emotions: A misnomer we should abandon.

History of psychology·2026
Same author

The Diagnostic Value of Language Screening in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Validation and Application of the Sydney Language Battery.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2021
Same author

Self-Monitoring in Speaking: In Defense of a Comprehension-Based Account.

Journal of cognition·2020
Same author

On (Correctly Representing) Comprehension-Based Monitoring in Speaking: Rejoinder to Nozari (2020).

Journal of cognition·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

4.8K

How attention controls naming: Lessons from Wundt 2.0.

Ardi Roelofs1

  • 1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognition, Radboud University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|February 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Wundt's attentional model, implemented as Wundt 2.0, explains the Stroop effect's time course using top-down inhibition. General intelligence (g) predicts Stroop interference, supporting the model and alpha band activity evidence.

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.0K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

4.8K
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

7.0K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Modern computational models of attentional control in vocal naming, like the Stroop task, often fail to explain the time course of interference.
  • Wilhelm Wundt's 1902 model proposed top-down inhibition as a key mechanism, a component largely absent in contemporary models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement and test Wundt's (1902) model of attentional control, termed Wundt 2.0, for explaining vocal naming interference.
  • To investigate the role of perceptual inhibition in the Stroop task and its time course using computational simulations.
  • To examine the relationship between general intelligence (g) and Stroop interference, and the absence of response inhibition during vocal naming.

Main Methods:

  • Computational simulations of Wundt's model applied to color-word Stroop and picture-word interference tasks.
  • Analysis of existing evidence on oscillatory brain activity in the alpha frequency band.
  • Empirical study correlating Raven's Progressive Matrices scores (measuring g) with Stroop task performance.

Main Results:

  • Computer simulations demonstrated the necessity of perceptual inhibition for modeling the interference and its time course.
  • Evidence from alpha band activity supported the model's reliance on perceptual inhibition.
  • Higher Raven scores (g) predicted greater Stroop effect magnitude in fast errors, aligning with the Wundt 2.0 model.
  • Empirical data indicated an absence of response inhibition during vocal naming in the Stroop task.

Conclusions:

  • Wundt's (1902) model, implemented as Wundt 2.0, effectively explains the time course of attentional interference in vocal naming tasks.
  • Perceptual inhibition, a key component of Wundt's model, is crucial for understanding Stroop-like interference.
  • General intelligence (g) plays a role in Stroop performance, and Wundt's model offers enduring insights into attention and cognitive performance.