Digital publishing isn't enough: the case for 'blueprints' in scientific communication

Area of Science:

• Scientific communication
• Research methodology
• Open science

Background:

• Traditional scientific communication relies on outdated methods like paper-based observations and articles.
• Current methods are insufficient for complex scientific challenges and hinder reproducibility.
• The Materials and Methods sections in scientific papers have become less detailed, impacting research replication.

Purpose of the Study:

• To advocate for a fundamental shift in scientific communication and data sharing practices.
• To propose the adoption of reusable experimental 'blueprints' for enhanced scientific reproducibility and collaboration.

Main Methods:

• Conceptual shift from traditional prose-based reporting to structured, reusable experimental designs.
• Analogy drawn with modern software engineering practices like computer-aided design and source code versioning.
• Proposal for 'blueprints' encompassing experiment designs, material flows, reaction parameters, data, and analytical procedures.

Main Results:

• Current scientific communication tools are inadequate for modern research complexities.
• Lack of detailed methodological information in publications leads to difficulties in reproducing findings.
• A new paradigm is necessary to facilitate effective scientific sharing and innovation.

Conclusions:

• Implementing reusable scientific blueprints can revolutionize scientific communication.
• This approach can establish the foundation for a truly open-source science ecosystem.
• Such a system would foster a supply chain of high-quality innovations and discoveries.