Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Implementing New Working Practices Through a Structured Support Model for Systematic Work Environment Management: A
Fredrik Molin1, Therese Hellman, Magnus Svartengren
1Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University (Dr Molin, Dr Hellman, Dr Svartengren); and IPF, the Institute for Organizational and Leadership Development at Uppsala University (Dr Molin), Uppsala, Sweden.
Implementing a structured support model for the psychosocial work environment requires an easily understandable and applicable structure. Strong commitment and clear communication from upper management are key to successful adoption in Swedish municipalities.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Organizational Psychology
- Public Administration
Background:
- The psychosocial work environment significantly impacts employee well-being and organizational effectiveness.
- Structured support models are increasingly implemented to address workplace psychosocial factors.
- Understanding implementation facilitators and barriers is crucial for successful adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation of a structured support model.
- Focus on the psychosocial work environment within Swedish municipal organizations.
- Provide insights for optimizing the adoption of such support models.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study conducted in six Swedish municipalities over two years.
- Utilized 63 semi-structured interviews and focus groups with key stakeholders.
- Employed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for data analysis.
Main Results:
- The support model must possess a user-friendly structure, easily understood and applied by work groups and employees.
- Immediate applicability of the model to daily work is essential for uptake.
- Support from both first-line managers and upper management emerged as a critical facilitating factor.
Conclusions:
- Upper management commitment to the support model is paramount for successful implementation.
- Clear communication from upper management regarding the model's purpose and objectives is vital.
- Effective leadership endorsement and consistent messaging are necessary for organizational change.
More Related Videos
12:22Mindfulness in Motion MIM: An Onsite Mindfulness Based Intervention MBI for Chronically High Stress Work Environments to Increase Resiliency and Work Engagement
Published on: July 1, 2015
10:34Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water
Published on: August 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Factors Affecting Workability
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR