Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 18, 2025

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
Published on: May 24, 2022
Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: An Umbrella Review.
Luísa Bandeira Lopes1,2, João Albernaz Neves2,3, João Botelho2,4
1Dental Pediatrics Department, Egas Moniz-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.
Regenerative Endodontic Procedures (REP) aim to regenerate damaged teeth. This review found that existing systematic reviews on REP lack high methodological quality, indicating a need for better research.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Regenerative Medicine
- Dental Research
Background:
- Regenerative Endodontic Procedure (REP) is a biologically based treatment for damaged pulp-dentin complex.
- REP seeks to replace damaged tissue with new, vital tissue.
- Assessing the quality of existing evidence on REP is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the methodological quality of existing systematic reviews (SRs) on Regenerative Endodontic Procedures (REP).
- To assess the quality of evidence concerning REP protocols and outcomes.
- To identify research gaps and guide future high-standard studies in REP.
Main Methods:
- An umbrella review methodology was employed.
- A comprehensive electronic database search was performed across multiple scientific databases.
- The Measurement Tool to Assess SRs criteria 2 (AMSTAR2) was used to evaluate the Risk of Bias (RoB) of included SRs.
Main Results:
- Out of 403 initial entries, 29 systematic reviews (SRs) met the inclusion criteria.
- The majority of included SRs demonstrated suboptimal methodological quality: 10 were critically low, 3 were low, and 14 were moderate.
- Only 2 SRs were rated as high quality, indicating a significant limitation in the current evidence base for REP.
Conclusions:
- The overall quality of evidence from existing systematic reviews on Regenerative Endodontic Procedures is not favorable.
- There is a critical need for future high-standard systematic reviews and well-designed clinical trials.
- Improved research is essential to better clarify clinical protocols and outcomes associated with REP.
More Related Videos
03:07Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
06:06Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy and Probiotic Lactobacillus Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontitis and Peri-Implant Disease
Published on: May 9, 2022