Related Experiment Videos
Saudi Arabia Guidelines for diabetic macular edema: A consensus of the Saudi Retina Group
Abdullah S AlQahtani1, Mohammad A Hazzazi1, Saad A Waheeb1
1From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications are major public health burdens in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is 19.7% and the prevalence of diabetic macular edema (DME) is 5.7% in Saudi Arabia. Diabetic macular edema is a vision-threatening complication of DR and a major cause of vision loss worldwide. Ocular treatments include retinal laser photocoagulation, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, intravitreal corticosteroids, and vitreoretinal surgery when necessary. The present consensus was developed as a part of the Saudi Retina Group's efforts to generate Saudi guidelines and consensus for the management of DME, including recommendations for its diagnosis, treatment, and best practice. The experts' panel stipulates that the treatment algorithm should be categorized according to the presence of central macula involvement. In patients with no central macular involvement, laser photocoagulation is recommended as the first-line option. Patients with central macular involvement and no recent history of cardiovascular (CVS) or cerebrovascular disorders can be offered anti-VEGF agents as the first-line option. In the case of non-responders (defined as an improvement of <20% in optical coherence tomography or a gain of fewer than 5 letters in vision), switching to another anti-VEGF agent or steroids should be considered after 3 injections. Within the class of steroids, dexamethasone implants are recommended as the first choice. In patients with a recent history of CVS events, the use of anti-VEGF agents is not recommended, regardless of their lens status. The experts' panel recommends that a future study be conducted to provide a cut-off point for early switching to steroid implants in pseudo-phakic eyes.