Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Transcriptome Analysis of Single Cells

Transcriptome Analysis of Single Cells

Published on: April 25, 2011

Evaluation of machine learning approaches for cell-type identification from single-cell transcriptomics data.

Yixuan Huang¹, Peng Zhang²

¹George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC, USA.

Briefings in Bioinformatics

|February 21, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparison Between Modified Sommerlad and Sommerlad-Furlow Modified Primary Palatoplasty: A Large Sample Retrospective Study.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2026

Same author

Deep operational normality modeling: an unsupervised framework with potential applicability to supply chain resilience.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Anti-RSV drug screening and inhibition of RSV infection by lapatinib through the IL-17 pathway.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2026

Same author

Climate-driven redistribution of Cheilinus wrasses and Acanthaster planci.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026

Same author

Transcriptomic Analyses and Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) Identify Key Drought-Responsive Genes in Rice Roots (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) Under PEG Treatment.

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

HIF-1α integrates lipogenic FASN and glycolytic GLUT3 to overcome intratumor oxidative and hypoxic stress for colorectal cancer metastasis.

Oncogene·2026

Same journal

K-attention: a biologically informed attention operator for data-efficient sequence-based omics modeling.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

Accurate prediction of asparagine deamidation in biologics using advanced machine learning models.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

scImmuneCo: a compendium of cell-type-specific functional modules for decoding immune responses from single-cell RNA-seq data.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

scGenoByte: a GenoByte embedding transformer with biological priors for cell type annotation.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

FerroScore: a statistical approach for quantifying tumor-related ferroptosis based on omics data.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026

Same journal

METEOR: a data-adaptive Mendelian randomization method for powerful detection of shared and specific exposures underlying multiple outcomes.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026

See all related articles

Machine learning models can automate cell-type identification in single-cell transcriptomics data, overcoming manual annotation limitations. Linear Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression models offer the best performance and speed for this task.

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology

Background:

Single-cell transcriptomics reveals cellular heterogeneity but relies on manual cell-type identification, which is slow and error-prone.
Automated cell phenotype classification is needed to improve the analysis of complex single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Purpose of the Study:

To comprehensively evaluate machine learning models for automated cell phenotype classification in single-cell transcriptomics.
To provide a guideline for selecting appropriate machine learning models for single-cell data analysis.

Main Methods:

Evaluated 10 machine learning models using 20 diverse single-cell RNA sequencing datasets.
Assessed model performance based on classification accuracy and computation time for intra-dataset and inter-dataset experiments.

Keywords:

benchmarking cell identity classification machine learning single-cell RNA sequencing

More Related Videos

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Published on: May 22, 2017

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Published on: January 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Transcriptome Analysis of Single Cells

Transcriptome Analysis of Single Cells

Published on: April 25, 2011

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Published on: May 22, 2017

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Published on: January 10, 2019

Analyzed model sensitivity to feature number, annotation levels, and dataset complexity.

Main Results:

Most machine learning classifiers performed well, with accuracy decreasing on more complex datasets.
Linear Support Vector Machine (linear-SVM) and Logistic Regression demonstrated superior performance and fast computation times.
Model performance varied based on dataset complexity and annotation granularity.

Conclusions:

Linear-SVM and Logistic Regression are recommended for automated cell phenotype classification in single-cell transcriptomics.
This study offers guidance for researchers and highlights areas for future development of automated classification tools.