Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
Increasing Older Adult Involvement in Geriatric Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
Wanda Rietkerk1, Jannet de Jonge-de Haan2, Joris P J Slaets3,4
1Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, 3647University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Implementing goal setting and motivational interviewing (MI) in older adults proved challenging. Suboptimal application of these techniques hindered potential well-being improvements in community-dwelling seniors.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Behavioral Science
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Goal setting and motivational interviewing (MI) are recognized techniques for promoting healthy behaviors and enhancing well-being.
- Previous interventions utilizing these methods in community-dwelling older adults did not demonstrate improved well-being.
- The current study investigated implementation processes as a potential explanation for the lack of observed benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the implementation quality of goal setting and MI within a geriatric assessment service for older adults.
- To identify factors contributing to the suboptimal application of these behavioral change techniques.
- To understand how implementation challenges might impact the potential for improved well-being.
Main Methods:
- Goals set during comprehensive geriatric assessments were analyzed for their behavior-change potential.
- Adherence to goal setting and MI principles was assessed through review of audiotaped interactions.
- Interviews with care professionals were conducted to gather insights on implementation barriers.
Main Results:
- Over 90% of the 280 goals set for 230 frail older adults had low potential for behavior change.
- Quality benchmarks for MI were met in only one of eleven assessed interactions.
- Implementation was constrained by contextual factors and limited proficiency of care professionals.
Conclusions:
- The implementation of goal setting and MI in this proactive assessment service was suboptimal.
- Barriers related to goal quality, MI fidelity, and professional competence significantly limited the effectiveness of the intervention.
- Suboptimal implementation likely diminished the potential for enhancing the well-being of participating older adults.
More Related Videos
07:40Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
Published on: May 31, 2021
11:21Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Evaluation
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age