Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Reference Values Matter: Fewer Patients With Malnutrition Using American Compared to More Recent German Growth Charts
Helmut Ellemunter1, Markus Dumke2, Gratiana Steinkamp1,3
1Cystic Fibrosis Centre at the Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Child and Adolescent Health, Paediatrics III, Austria.
Choosing the right growth reference is crucial for pediatric patient care. Different datasets, like the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and German KiGGS percentiles, yield varying results for children with cystic fibrosis.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Clinical Nutrition
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Accurate anthropometric reference values are essential for evaluating child growth and comparing data across institutions and countries.
- Growth charts provide critical benchmarks for assessing patient health and identifying potential growth abnormalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the anthropometric reference data from the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) growth charts and the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents Study (KiGGS) percentiles.
- To evaluate the impact of using different reference datasets on the assessment of children with cystic fibrosis.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of two established anthropometric reference datasets: CDC growth charts and KiGGS percentiles.
- Z-score calculations for weight and height in a cohort of children with cystic fibrosis using both datasets.
- Statistical comparison of the proportion of children with decreased z scores (<-2) and median z scores between the two reference groups.
Main Results:
- A significantly smaller proportion of children with cystic fibrosis exhibited decreased z scores (<-2) for weight (5.0% vs. 7.4%) and height (3.0% vs. 6.3%) when using CDC growth charts compared to KiGGS percentiles (P < 0.0001).
- Median z scores for both weight and height were higher when assessed against the CDC reference data.
- The choice of growth reference significantly influenced the interpretation of anthropometric status.
Conclusions:
- The selection of an appropriate growth reference dataset is critical and can influence clinical management decisions for children, particularly those with chronic conditions like cystic fibrosis.
- Discrepancies in growth assessment highlight the importance of considering the reference data used when comparing patient outcomes between different healthcare settings or countries.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Nature and Nurture
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns
Regression Toward the Mean

